Avalanche - page 445
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Very happy for you, quite sincerely. And even a little jealous: I definitely would not have developed this field and would have passed it by.
Just one nuance. Just as in a joke :-).
Any strategy must be justified.
Otherwise, the trader who uses the strategy will not be able to save not so much his earnings, but at least his deposit, if something goes wrong.
You need not just an understanding of how the strategy works - you need... how should I say... a meta-understanding of how it works :) A developer of a strategy (especially of an automatic one) must understand how to react adequately to market changes, and what to change in the strategy.
These are all seemingly obvious things. Volga flows into Caspian Sea and Oka - into Volga. But nevertheless the forums are overflowing with messages in the style of "BUY A PRIVATE COUNTER!!!!11adin". So buy one, for fuck's sake. But what are you going to do when the EA starts to fail in a month? Hurt the seller? :) What if he doesn't know what to do? Doesn't possess that very meta-understanding? The question is hopelessly rhetorical. We all know the results. Even the oft-mentioned Expensivbaer with Alpari has a very strange result - http://www.alpari.ru/ru/pamm/info/id/125810/. Not to mention Robot Vasya and his cronies... :D
But back to Avalanche. It's amazing how you can hope for a system that is NOT adaptive in any sense, and will sell out with absolutely non-zero probability sooner or later. What is there to hope for? A timely bounce? And again, the system is not adaptive in the least, so there is simply nothing to change? Ridiculous. It reminds me of Pelevin:
- 'Pyotr Sergeyevich,' he said, 'have you ever thought where we are going?
- Are you in trouble," Petr Sergeyevich asked through his food, "aren't you? 'Spit it out. [skipped]
- Still. Where to?
- Don't you know yourself?
- Is it hard for you to tell?
- No, it's not hard.
- So tell me. Where do you think we're going?
- Where, where. Do you want to hear it again? Of course we're going. To the ruined bridge. Why do you fill your head with such bullshit at a young age, Andryukha?
There's a lot of other examples, not only from fiction. Here in the topic a certain alexandro posted a real story about plum, when using a bare martingale, which in essence is Lavina.
Mathemat, I think your quoted utterance was just a kind of compliment to Galina. You can't fail to understand that an avalanche - no matter how you use it - is really something akin to a casino game, that is, with a knowingly negative result, if you don't take luck into account.
Think, people. Think. There are no easy ways to make money. Really, don't fill your head with bullshit :) Dixie.
My code has a simple function, first the bot tries to close all with a current minus in the account
Yep, right! but just the opposite ((( - to close just such a TS, you should first trade in the +, and then in -, because closing a loss equal to the deposit leads first to a margin call, and not the fact that then will be closed profitable trades
SZZ: nice example how you should not do - having a 100 k deposit, make a loss of -140 k to earn + 147 k with take - 5-8 pips, it's better to put a grid trader with such take
You people amaze me!
At first, you criticized everything that touched the avalanche, and you criticized everything and everyone, left and right. The argument seemed to be there, that is, its complete absence. They had no profitable accounts and that was fine. I had showed them more than one and offered them for everybody to see. NOT ENOUGH FOR YOU! Show me a profit and we'll think about it... maybe... if you really convince me...
i showed you the account now, so what? Nobody was interested ! it's amazing !
I say that an avalanche in its pure form will of course lead to a loss... We may lose any deposit, but the end of the account is depreciated as 2*2=4 )))).
But in skilful hands it is an excellent tool that can work perfectly on depo, and very small, and with fixed risks, and with limited drawdown.
This is a very important market situation, in which the market participants are often unaware of the basic rules of risk management.
I do not have to go far to get examples, for example, Egor writes: For example Egor writes: "To close on such a TS one should first make trades with +, and then -, because closing a loss equal to the deposit leads first to a margin call, and not the fact that profitable trades will be closed after that" . You do not know that even a beginner in forex, Egor knows the margin call on the balance in the account, not the drawdown. The moment when they close the minus position, even if the volume of 300 000 rubles, there is also a plus, which at this time overlaps the minus.
Many people on this branch do not know elementary things. And ignorance is the root of all evil for any trader. And when it comes to writing strategies, and moreover a robot, this point is crucial.
All, even subconsciously, are looking for the grail, and while most searchers somewhere deep in their hearts are convinced that the world simply MUST give it to them, one way or another.
The mentality is astonishing: nobody wants to work, nobody needs it, and give us the grail, but hurry up!
Take it! Here it is, lying there for a long time unattended )))) We just need to tweak it and go to battle! No, give us the ready thing !
GOOD LUCK TO ALL DUMMIES, AT THE END OF YOUR LIFE YOU'LL UNDERSTAND WHAT'S WHAT, BUT I DOUBT IT VERY MUCH.
Galina:
Even a Forex novice knows that the margin is covered by Egor's account balance, not by the drawdown. The moment whenminus positions are closed, even if the volume of 300 000 roubles, there is also a plus, which at this time by an order overlaps the minus.
Well, you repeated what I wrote: with a 100K deposit, if you close a loss of -140K, the balance will be -40K and not a fact that the DC will not close all margin call positions, although in the profit is an order for +147K
Many people just do not understand the simple rules of risk management, they stubbornly do not want to delve into it and do some digging.
Yep, with all due respect to the beautiful sex, you are a "straightforward blonde" who teaches you how not to calculate risk managment: the entire depo is in the market, trading time is 3 minutes.
Basically, no mathematical calculations, no money management and risk management, nothing even close to an avalanche, just a beautiful demo account with a super profitable situation played out for fools.
FOR SURE YOU WILL GET THE SAME RESULT IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AN AVALANCHE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
Egor's margin is based on account balance, not drawdown.
Many on this thread do not know basic things.
Galina, you are an optimist: actually sell both "margin call" and "stop out" orders by equity, not by balance;) ...
There are cases when the CD closes all market orders with a negative balance, despite the fact that the equity was in the +, and then explain to the support service who was right is tedious and ineffective.
SZS: If I am not mistaken, al.ree does not give the possibility to place a large order if the balance is less than the margin, although the equity can afford to place such an order.
You people amaze me!
...
Get him! Here he is, lying around for a long time, unaccompanied.) We'll just tweak it and go to battle. No, give us the ready thing !...
Galina - BRAVO!!! You're really, really rubbing your nose in... to all those... "MONEYBAGS"... :-))) Rihtuya, rihtuya...
From myself ... for the umpteenth time, as the topicstarter has already repeatedly warned about it ...
That yes, it is indeed possible to drain, etc. For this you need to divide the depo into several equal parts (depending on your version of the system and its average drawdown over the reporting period), then, let's say, you charge the 1st part - plum soon after start, the second part, with possibly already new optimized parameters - the same ... the third part - here already "shot"... withdraw some funds from the account and continue... - all this for the option with the maximum number of flips... the drawdown is limited to the size of the depo... The drawdown is limited to the size of the deposit (this is what you're doing) - someone here mentioned a system that allows you to start with 500 USD in your account. At the same time, of course, control the process, after X days, carry out optimization parameters, etc..
P.S. "A pig will find dirt everywhere" - you can give a lot of reasons why this strategy is not profitable... But, I'm sure, with a competent approach ... read above, the basis is already painted.
Galina, you have not patented a super profitable TS on the forums, which in some time resulted in zero profit. I wonder if I could find the topic.
P.S. Are there any psychiatrists out there? Why does she annoy me?
The lies irritate you.
It happens so you lie once and then you feel uncomfortable admitting it - it is better to admit you are wrong and stop winding up the tangle.
Just as Galina came up with the idea of profit by the catch, she cannot stop (her image does not allow for it).
The lies irritate you.
It is better to admit that you are wrong and stop winding up the tangle.
Galina came up with the idea of profit by the catch, and now she cannot stop (her image does not allow it).
You do not like the avalanche?
You do not like people who are interested in the avalanche?