Avalanche - page 438

 
Pavel447:

Good evening!

Post if anyone can a more or less working net avalanche...

Thanks in advance!)

I don't think anyone will post it, unless it's overlaid.
 
Serj_Che:
It's unlikely that anyone will post it, unless they do it.

That's how it's going to be... what if...)

 

"There is no thing in the world worth mercy,

The things created are not worthy of mercy! " // you know who)))

Bullshit, guys...

 
Pavel447:

Good evening!

Post if anyone can a more or less working net avalanche...

Thanks in advance!)


in the attached file on the first post of this page.
 

Buy an Avalanche that allows work on small deposits...

I once monitored one which started at $300...

But contacts of the author were lost with time...

Any sellers?)

 
Taurius:

Buy an Avalanche that allows work on small deposits...

I once monitored one which started at $300...

But contacts of the author were lost with time...

Any sellers?)

Yes, there is, a special version, sharpened for the losers. I can sell it. It very quickly drains Kolya Marzhov's entire depot - the smaller the deposit, the faster. That's why I decided to sell it for $300. You'll sell it all the same, so at least I'll get something, not just Kolya.
 
it is better to optimise with an optimiser optimiser
 
Sta2066:

Here's a system that's close in principle.

But it is in the tester. But in real life, the tick disappears, there are not enough bars in the window, there is no connection.

Although when everything is working, retrospectively trades in the tester are repeated one-to-one.

I think we have a good chance to check this one.

The key phrase is highlighted in red.

Has anyone managed to make a TS with stable negative MO (~1-2 spreads) on a constant lot,

to get a stable profit by martingale (with a reasonable range of lot steps) at least in the tester?

 
lasso:

pull out to a stable profit with martingale (with a sane range of lot steps) at least in the tester?

https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/126421/page62
 

Igor, I respect your ability to dig into the subject,

but where on your link do you see a comparison of two pure tests of the TS with/without Martingale?