![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What are the grounds?
Are there any contraindications?
The last question is not for me, but the first ones are not for Korey, so I dare (but probably for the last time in this thread) to speak out again.
I referred you to textbooks and classics by timbo, not by Korey. That inattention is just an extra touch that proves your lack of respect for the forum. This is also evidenced by your wording "I wonder if you even understand what I've written to you all before or not?".
I don't think that by not respecting the forum you will manage to get yourself treated with respect. I hope this comment is on point in the thread and won't be taken by you as a subtle disregard for your questions.
Thank you for correcting me. Korey and timbo have merged into one character. So a question for timbo as well.
I'm not trying to get myself respected on the forum, in case you haven't noticed :) I'm not interested, I have the opportunity to satisfy my ego not only on forums :)
Are there any contraindications?
Answer the question :)
*Wondered* ... What did Adler have to do with it? He was just explaining the existing motives for behaviour, not the purpose and meaning of a person's life.
Exactly! Your motives (according to A.) and your motives as you try to present them - kind of in dissonance )
Answer the question :)
...
I have a life :)
uh, what about my copyrights on that phrase? )))
Exactly! Your motives (according to A.) and your motives, as you try to present them - are kind of in dissonance )
Who says I have the motives Adler wrote about? If I do, no one knows about them but me.
Who says I have the motives Adler wrote about? If I do, no one knows about them but me.
Apparently you are a little more superficially familiar with A. than I'd like to think)
Answer. - On the grounds that there is no contraindication.
The person you corrected did not allow you to do so, which is tantamount to a ban. That is your "contraindication". Breaking these "unwritten rules" means you have no respect for your interlocutor and the environment as a whole.
Apparently you are a little more superficially familiar with A. than I'd like to think )
Where does it show?