You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This is a variant of trading in the channel, leading sometimes to a profit, but more often to neurasthenia.
The point was different: 1. Recognise a possible start of a trend - open a position in the expectation of inertial continuation of the movement. 2. Limit the open position to "reasonable limits" (SL and TP). 3. Monitor the situation: as soon as the context changes - record what you get (profit, loss).
I pondered on Uncle Peter's words and this is what I saw... Probably the alien divo by negating the forecast means that making forecasts is a myth (or even a mirage), the main thing is to enter the deal in the course of movement (jump in) and as soon as possible to take a position in b/w. After that whatever the strong move or not, how much the market gives and how much we can take, and if not, if you do not have time to get in b/w, you have to cut your losses as soon as possible. And the main thing is to find (recognize) this movement, even if it is not at its very beginning....... I think his explanation will sink into oblivion at this point...... Well, never mind, take care of your liver...
I have a similar TS. It works in a trend. In a flat, the amplitude of which I determine myself, it slows down a little. For H&D trade the flat/trend ratio should not be more than 4/1.
For trade justification I use spectrum analysis, synthesis and indexes.
You'd better give your opinion on this issue - if the price has moved away from a fair price - why will it necessarily move back to that price????
No, it is imbalance between true and fair prices - the imbalance is growing and eeeeee ..... - the end of growth and reversal of the trend (decrease of imbalance) is the beginning of movement.
Uncle Petya, Uncle Petya. How do you count pulses)))
Troll, not troll ... In April 1998 a GP share was worth 4.5 cents while at the beginning of December 1997 GP accepted my offer at 1.8 c.u. A drop of 40 times in 4 months. Are you still looking for justice? Then we're coming to you!
Yes, it does build up, and eeee... it's bound to come, only Uncle Kolya's yi... is usually ahead of the curve. Here's an example: At the end of 1997, all sane people understood that the fair price for a Gazprom share is at least 10 kroner. They were absolutely right, but only those of those smart people who didn't start guided by that consideration from 10.11.1997 survived. :)