EURUSD - Trends, Forecasts and Implications (Part 2) - page 780

 
strangerr:

And from that circle, draw a down arrow:)))

)))) This is a corrective movement. The downward movement persists, in my opinion.
 
gip:

And we are based on historical newspaper ducks, on quotes from yesterday and last year, on some dude's dream waves. Anything but reliable information.

Reliable information? What's that? Volumes, insider knowledge or knowledge based on experience?
 
gip:

That's the right one. Overrated? By whom? By us, underestimated. And we are based on historical newspaper ducks, on yesterday's and last year's quotes, on some dude's dream waves. Anything but based on reliable information.

And besides, it's not the euro that's going up, it's the dollar that's going down. It is really overvalued by us.

An example of reliable information, for the sake of argument?
 

gip:

Вот это самое верное. Переоценен? Кем? Нами-то недооценен. А мы по газетным уткам исторической давности, по котировкам вчерашним и прошлогодним, по каким-то приснившемся одному чуваку волнам. По чему угодно, только не исходя из достоверной информации.

Ну и кроме того, сейчас не евро растет, а доллар падает. Вот он нами действительно переоценен.

barfly13:
Reliable information? What is it? Volumes, insider knowledge or knowledge based on experience?


What about other information? ....

For example... Some guys benefit from making this wave on the 4H look like a pullback three...

Recognizing this, most people will take shorts, when the volumes of shorts increase, draw the fifth wave, collecting stops...

Of course, people recognize the full wave on the 4H as an upward impulse (the first wave) and begin, if the second wave occurs, to buy the continuation of the upward trend, perhaps up to 100% "pullback" (1.1880) ...

But then it all will collapse "accidentally" because of some news, further downwards, collecting a lot of money from everybody who bought ...

Of course, the "news" is also involved in this fundraising.

How about this scenario? :)

For example, if the TV news says "the euro is rising fast", and it was rising before, it means that it will be dumped soon and the people need to buy it...

So where's the truth...?

 
BOL:


But then it all collapses 'accidentally' on some news further down the line, collecting more dough from everyone who bought in...

Well it won't collapse accidentally, and if it does, then we'll go down with it too... If the target/support level is broken then what's there to argue with...
and there's really an idea down there to buy a lot, somewhere at 33, we'll specify later...
 
strangerr:

I don't persist, I take dough both ways, and explain to me how it can be f...tsz when orders are the same size both ways, i.e. lock? You persevere against the market, you gather on the unbounded peaks :))))

there you have two sells hanging down there that are extremely unlike working both ways, i would look at you if it went up :)
 
RekkeR:
An example of reliable information, for the sake of argument?

Jorik, I believe him as myself, 70 per cent:)))
 
Eh, I wonder how people still trade on waves. I stopped trusting those waves etc a long time ago. All this is a myth and fairy tale. If you look closely at the chart, you can see not only the wave, but also Obama's face. Look for other bases, screw the waves.
 
FXlike:

You've got two sells down there, very unlike a two way job, I'd like to see you if it goes up :)


I don't mind it going up. And the sells at the bottom are not two, but three.

 
strangerr:


I'm just fine with going up. And the sells below are not two, but three.


And I will be buying there, I have to get to 4150, otherwise the sales are really low).