EURUSD - Trends, Forecasts and Implications (Part 2) - page 784
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
A fluctuation point can be seen by an experienced trader even with the untrained eye. You don't have to draw waves to do so. The bottom line is that waves cannot be trusted. For example, Wolfe himself would not be conducting webinars for money, he would make money on his waves and live decently.
If you learn to apply it well, you do not need the rest; the wolf overlays on ZZ and the markup of different TFs may judge to what extent the movement will be...
I don't trust this nonsense.
It will take you a while to realize that forex is still a casino and you may start to think about it. You can study for the rest of your life without ever gaining an understanding. You give up waves, tomorrow you will say that triangles are also rubbish, then figures, channels... A reasonable person would not give up the baggage of acquired knowledge and would not make an issue of what is better than triangles, channels, waves, coffee grounds or "reliable information". Perhaps, the approach should be complex, the perception will be clearer, looking at the position from different angles, you will be able to see 3D on a chart and experience the thrill, like a pre-revolutionary peasant who saw a steam engine for the first time on the screen.
:)))
OK, I won't stop the degenerate alcoholics from being idiotic.
This morbidly persistent partiality for alcohol can be found in three cases:
a) a codependent janitor in the statistics department;
b) a retired statistician with a drunken husband;
c) a veteran statistician, with a sissy nature acquired in the process of aging in a female collective.
Tick the box on the test for yourself.
:))))
If you do not know the name of the thread, you may have to look in the other direction. As for the waves, I do not trust them either, they have too many conventions and their beginning and end is unpredictable.
And on the topic it would be more interesting to learn about your prose and your goals
It will take you a while to realize that forex is still a casino and you may start to think about it. You can study for the rest of your life without ever gaining an understanding. You give up waves, tomorrow you will say that triangles are also rubbish, then figures, channels... A reasonable person would not give up the baggage of acquired knowledge and would not make an issue of what is better than triangles, channels, waves, coffee grounds or "reliable information". Perhaps, the approach must be complex, the perception will be clearer when you look at the position from different sides, you can see the 3D graphics and feel the thrill, like a pre-revolutionary peasant who saw a steam engine for the first time on the screen
:)))
So you're suggesting we just believe in something that doesn't exist? You can study for the rest of your life, you're right. You can study poop as well as learning how far to spit or how loud to fart. A sane person wouldn't do this nonsense. You can study anything, the question is, do I need it? To study for the rest of your life what is of no use to you. You study it and nobody is asking you to. I trade quite successfully and do not use waves at all. I have my own methodology, but of course I won't tell you what it is. When there is a signal, I trade, when there is no signal, I sit and wait.You know waves ? Well done to you ! You are cool !
I think the U-turn
Any tool allows you to do analysis and derive a prediction curve....