EURUSD - Trends, Forecasts and Implications (Part 2) - page 783

 
gip:


Did you take it personally? :))) Well, yes, alcoholism is common and alcoholics are always ready to stand up for their fellow drinker J)))

Do you throw yourself at passers-by in a squirrel?


You're kind of stuttering, aren't you?)
I've been reading your posts for a long time, there's not a single thought in them, they're just cheap jokes...)
 
FXlike:

over-sold, it makes sense to start looking at buying


of course again to the weekly boundary we are gradually reversing the channel - the consequence is preparing for a serious move downwards, an abrupt imbalance is not allowed, it will create an inverse spring effect
 
forte928:

Ward 6.

Is there something you want to say? On the subject or just something along the lines of number six?
 
chepikds:
Monday, it looks like not everyone has let go yet)))))

Now it's going to go up to at least 1.41
 
barfly13:

Is there something you want to say? On the topic of the thread, or just something like number six?)

You're in the wrong business. You're discussing high matter.
 
forte928:

You're in the wrong business, you're discussing high-minded matters.

I agree, off-topic, but what can you do if a person is so narcissistic and tries to hurt others with idiotic jokes, while being silent when asked about the topic...
 
barfly13:

I agree, off-topic, but what to do if a person is so narcissistic and tries to hurt others with idiotic jokes, while being silent when asked about the topic...

The inadequate should be dealt with by the inadequate -
 
RekkeR:

In order to understand whether the wave structure is disturbed, you have to at least assume this structure.

Idle chatter, set up a branch with Gip - "Reliable Information". :)))

When I studied these waves you must have thought that Forex is a casino. So don't teach the scientist here already. No one trades stupidly. There are many ways to trade, channels, patterns, triangle-based, etc. all of which I can rely on, but not the waves. You may as well excuse me and don't even try to convince me, there is a basis for that. You may go on drawing your waves and guess where the fifth wave is, where the third wave is, etc. It reminds me of reading the coffee grounds at granny's, she speaks nonsense, and people choose what they like, find comfort, truth, and their own benefit. As well as trading in waves, when an error occurs, they say, oh well, this is not that wave, this is the continuation of the previous wave. I do not trade on the basis of waves and I do not trust this nonsense.
 
SFB:
When I studied these waves you probably thought forex was a casino. So don't teach the scientist any more. No one trades stupidly. There are many ways to trade, channels, figures, triangle-based, etc. all of which I can rely on, but not the waves. You may as well excuse me and don't even try to convince me, there is a basis for that. You may go on drawing your waves and guess where the fifth wave is, where the third wave is, etc. It reminds me of fortune-telling with coffee grounds at the granny's, she speaks nonsense and people choose what they like, find comfort, truth, and their own benefit. As well as trading in waves, when an error occurs, they say, oh well, this is not that wave, this is the continuation of the previous wave. I do not trade on the basis of waves and I do not trust this nonsense.

The basis of waves comes from the important point of the beginning and the end of the oscillation - then you can judge with confidence which wave is which - the starting point is good, but the ending point is a matter of the older TF, or even those that are not visible on the MT... this gives you an idea of what should happen and how - the meterologist is wrong once, but every day...
 
forte928:

The basis of waves comes from the important point of the beginning and the end of this fluctuation - then we can confidently judge which wave is which - the beginning point is good, but the end point is an issue associated with older TFs or even those that are not visible on the MT... from this assumption follows what and how should go - the meterologist is wrong once but every day...
An experienced trader can see the oscillation point even with the naked eye. You do not need to draw waves for that. As a result, it turns out that waves cannot be trusted. For example Wolf himself would not hold webinars for money, he would make money on his waves and live decently.