Avalanche - page 457

New comment
 
And I have also come to the conclusion that it is useless to fight against negative expectation. Martin is just a summation and a carry-over of moose into the future. Entry has to be predicted, at least by 60%.
 
goldtrader:

Yes, they did:

Taras

  • Newbie Forex
  • Group:Users
  • Messages: 1
  • Registration:21 Nov 08
  • Name: Taras Anatolevich Sh

Posted on 09 February 2011 - 12:34 am

I'm an investor)))

I entrusted Galina the account for 17000 rubles which was emptied in 2 weeks it seems. I can give you my account balance if anybody wants it.
I have no time for that on the forums.

I want to note that with 17000 profit I have not received once.

Yeah... that's drama. 17,000 rubles. And not a single profit.

Who showed who what?

 
sever30:
you can take a screenshot of that text.
attached
Files:
screen.zip  67 kb
 


Galina has been very active in publicising her non-sleaze system based on the catchphrase (I've looked at pages 403 to 430 or so in this thread). It has long seemed unnatural to me, but now the explanation has been found, thanks to Stells.

 
PR for a thread with leaked real and negative feedback from an investor? Very interesting.
 

No, no, Galina PR'd her catch - here too. There were no links to those branches with monitoring.

But she did it very persistently. And it irritated others.

 
more posts in her fashion, ban her for violating forum rules. (I have an opinion, I can't argue with that).
 
Mathemat:

No, no, Galina PR'd her catch - here too. There were no links to those branches with monitoring.

But she did it very persistently. And it irritated others.


And for some reason I had a slightly different opinion of her... I wasn't talking about Loewin, especially not about Rumat, but about Galina.
 

Finally, I decided to finish the work on my version of the avalanche. The work has been going on intermittently for more than a year. I found the results acceptable.

I had to increase the maximum number of orders from 3 to 5 for the stable operation. The system is indication-free.


The symbol isEURUSD (Euro vs US Dollar)
Period1 Hour (H1) 2009.01.02 11:00 - 2011.06.07 22:59 (2009.01.01 - 2011.07.01)
ModelBy open prices (only for Expert Advisors with explicit bar opening control)



Bars in history15997Modelled ticks30991Modeling qualityn/a
Chart mismatch errors0




Initial deposit7500.00



Net profit22856.14Total profit48170.93Total loss-25314.80
Profitability1.90Expected payoff30.68

Absolute drawdown240.84Maximum drawdown2514.80 (17.34%)Relative drawdown17.34% (2514.80)

Total trades745Short positions (% win)373 (63.27%)Long positions (% win)372 (69.09%)

Profitable trades (% of all)493 (66.17%)Loss trades (% of all)252 (33.83%)
Largestprofitable trade1287.90losing deal-889.49
Averageprofitable deal97.71losing trade-100.46
Maximumcontinuous wins (profit)14 (183.55)Continuous losses (loss)4 (-246.35)
MaximumContinuous Profit (number of wins)1433.98 (3)Continuous loss (number of losses)-997.00 (2)
Averagecontinuous winnings3Continuous loss1

























































































 
khorosh:

Finally, I decided to finish the work on my version of the avalanche. The work has been going on intermittently for more than a year. I found the results acceptable.

I had to increase the maximum number of orders from 3 to 5 for the stable operation. The system is non-indicator.



I even know why I had to increase it. The Martini coefficient = 3 (if not more, I measured it by eye) is certainly cool. Either you're in or you're out, as they say.

Can you make a profit report for the last 5 years? I think the result is predictable.

1...450451452453454455456457458459460461462463464...523
New comment