Are there any trading robots in our galaxy that make money instead of losing??????? - page 21
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
CONCLUSION: Trading robots that can earn over a long distance and increase the deposit with or without auto lot does not exist! The market is changing + numerous filters of market makers, the very structure of the market if you want a system, built in such a way that it is impossible to earn and it keeps those who lost once and is trying to get back + those who sell systems, bots, indicators, etc. The casino is resting there is support from politicians, banks and the TV and everything looks fair if not for the "read above and in other branches" when in 10 years you read and study everything, and most importantly you lose your hard earned money come back to the conclusion :)
Hands will also lose sooner or later the best option took once and forgot forever.
You sound pessimistic))) People have been working for years and earn money. Of course, they lose sometimes, but on the whole they show a profit for the year. Do not scare the newbies, help them to understand the sea of rubbish that surrounds Forex.
There is no such thing. The exchange is first and foremost a sweepstakes (for individuals). Once you have entered a profitable series, you think you are a guru and, as a rule, you cannot reproduce the result. Big men with money and companies can do it, but their approach is completely different and their profit % is completely different. Just imagine, there are a bunch of accounts in brokerage companies, tens of thousands of active ones. Within a year, 10 accounts remain in profit. It's a win-win business.
Look at the results of the BVI or other traders' contests. The statistics speaks better than any words :) By the way, the market game is very addictive, akin to slot machines or casinos. The whole gloss and advertising of easy money is deposited in the subconsciousness, and the person is "addicted" for a long time. And the better educated you are, and God forbid, mathematical one, the more you think you are, applying sophisticated mathematical models to the market and getting off the market every time))) hahahaha!
There aren't any...
What grounds do you have for such categorical generalisations? If you personally or even thousands or millions of others don't have them, it's not a reason for saying that they don't have them at all.
The situation reminds of the position of many losers in life, when in order to justify their failures and inability to achieve success you can simply declare something like "life is shit" and then it somehow makes sense to fit into this concept ... everything is bad, not me being a loser.
Check out the results of the LCI or other trader contests. Statistics are more eloquent than any words :) .......
Why do you think that successful traders have to go to public trading gatherings and events? A truly successful trader is usually sufficiently motivated and warmed by his achievements, he has less need for public approval, recognition, delight of the public than unsuccessful ones or simple amateurs. Hence the situation follows, that a man is crying about a loss of $100 for a long time, loudly and with gusto, while he prefers to rejoice quietly and in a narrow circle (often in front of himself) over a earned dozen or hundreds thousand.
P.S. On the subject of the topic of the thread - they definitely exist, but it is not a fact that the authors or owners of such robots will be at your beck and call to report to a "respectable public" and confirm all the figures and facts.
In addition, many have repeatedly voiced on this forum a reasonable argument that the robot is just a tool, and like the use of any tool, it requires certain skills and effort to work successfully. Otherwise we will get to the old proverb: "Give a fool a *** glass one, he will break his *** and cut his hands". I would add that most likely they will say that the *** was defective.
What is your reason for such sweeping generalizations? If you personally do not have, or even thousands or millions of others, it is not a reason to say that they do not have.
The situation resembles the attitude of many losers in life, when in order to justify their failures and inability to succeed you can simply declare something like "life is shit" and then it somehow makes sense to fit into that concept..., it's all bad, not me being a loser.
Why do you think that successful traders necessarily have to shine in public near-trading hangouts and events? A truly successful trader is usually sufficiently motivated and warmed by his achievements, he has less need for public approval, recognition, delight of the public than unsuccessful ones or just novice amateurs. Hence the situation follows, that a man is crying about a loss of $100 for a long time, loudly and with gusto, while he prefers to rejoice quietly and in a narrow circle (often in front of himself) over a earned dozen or hundreds thousand.
P.S. On the subject of the topic of the thread - they definitely exist, but it is not a fact that the authors or owners of such robots will be at your beck and call to report to a "respectable public" and even verify the facts and figures.
In addition, many have repeatedly voiced on this forum a reasonable argument that the robot is just a tool, and like the use of any tool, it requires certain skills and effort to work successfully. Otherwise we will get to the old proverb: "Give a fool a *** glass one, he will break his *** and cut his hands". I would add that most likely he will also say that the *** was defective.
Let's rely on facts, like statistics, rather than subjective thoughts, OK? Those who make money can be defined as a margin of error, so tiny is the statistical minority.
A robot is just one tool...blah blah blah...it's from powerlessness.
Those who make money open pams and investment accounts, because their goal is to multiply profits, not conspiracy. And publicity in this case is a natural process leading to even greater profits, so do not blah-blah ... please ...
I don't know what you think about this, but you better understand that the real situation is different, and you don't know what to do and what to expect.
Let's rely on facts, like statistics, rather than subjective thoughts, OK? Those who make money can be defined as a margin of error, so tiny is the statistical minority.
A robot is just one tool...blah blah blah...it's from powerlessness.
Those who make money open pams and investment accounts, because their goal is to multiply profits, not conspiracy. And publicity in this case is a natural process leading to even greater profits, so do not blah-blah ... please ...
go to any account rating of any dtz - the top (5-10 accounts) are in good profits, the rest 5000 are lost
And what do you see as the problem?
What problem, I'm just talking about the chances of designing a profitable system, which are slim, so don't get complacent
Do you need it, this profitable system?
everyone needs it.