I am plagued by questions of the universe - page 15

 
FAGOTT:


Start with space.

There is so much space. Unfathomable even to our thinking.

So that "nothing from which the BW originated" and from nothing was outside of space and time, where was it?

Gotta have another drink.

PS

I think we have learned it thoroughly.

PS2

And if we compress time, where will we put it all?

Space is as infinite as time. Scientists are ashamed to admit it because there is no proof i.e. no formula.

Infinity as we can see is not measurable. This is the problem.

If space is taken as a ball for example, "time" is finite, because we can circle this ball along the plane and at the same time "time" will be infinite, because we can circle this ball an infinite number of times.

Time is infinite.

 
ULAD:

Had a shot of cognac, wiped my lips.)

Let's consult on how to create time.

If it was once created, what is stopping us from creating it now and selling it for example.

It's much easier with time. )))

TIME = MONEY. When there is no time, one spends money (taking a taxi) and vice versa (walking).

The postulate TIME - MONEY implies/consequences that there is no such thing as TIME, nor is there any such thing as MONEY. It is just cut paper, endowed by people with credibility.

Both time and money are invented by people.

 
charter:

It's much easier with time. )))

TIME = MONEY. When there is no time, money is spent and vice versa.

From the postulate of TIME - MONEY, it follows/consequences that there is no TIME, just as there is no MONEY. It's just cut paper, endowed by people with credibility.

Both time and money are made up by people.

Time is nothing but distance travelled at a certain speed.

The rich get richer faster))

 
ULAD:
Time is nothing but distance travelled at a certain speed.

In that case, a definition of speed would also be appropriate. )))

This is where science gets bogged down).

 

Speed is a relative thing. Relative to what is to be determined.

Regarding the boundaries of the universe? Well, there aren't any.

 
ULAD:

Speed is a relative thing. Relative to what is to be determined.

Regarding the boundaries of the universe? Well, there aren't any.

No, that's no good. Speed definition in the studio.)))
 
ULAD:
If a crow flies next to a train, its speed relative to the train will be less than that relative to the railway crossing. The rest is in WIKI.

Is it flying?! It is standing next to the train. Just because a crow pretends to flap its wings doesn't mean it is flying.
 
ULAD:
If a crow flies next to a train, its speed relative to the train will be less than that relative to the railway crossing. The rest is in WIKI.


The crow flies slower than the train, so what?

You define TIME through speed, but what is speed? Give a definition so that it is as clear and understandable to me as it is to you.))

 
ULAD:

If it is in the air it is flying or soaring, but if it is standing even on one leg, I don't know how it flies.

More than half of the US population believes it is the sun that revolves around the earth.

Nonsense...
 
FAGOTT:

well, great, so what?

There is a principle of the philosophy of knowledge - no theory (in physics) can claim to be complete. Facts and observations are accumulated. A theory is put forward which explains most (only part) of these facts as the theory cannot be complete. Then gradually more facts are accumulated and a new theory emerges which contains a part of the old one and which explains most (only a part) of the facts due to the fact that the theory may not be complete. And so on.

What is the discovery here? That physical theories cannot explain all the facts? This has always been known. That physical theories have to resort to abstractions? That too has always been known.

Does the afftar show the obvious and deliberately troll for his theories which he can experimentally verify? No.

Science in its progressive advancement will sooner or later break ALL the foundations of modern society with its achievements:

* FINANCE: with elementary particles, why not create "plenty of gold" to make everyone "gobsmacked"?!

* CONFIDENTIALITY: assuming there is a "global data bank" to which any computer could be connected, e.g. psychics, and to which any computer could be connected - there are NO secrets.

*THERE'S NOT ENOUGH FOR EVERYONE: The "descendants" of 3D printers will create all the goods by necessity.

* THE STATEWORK OF THE STATE\of THE UNION: individual inexhaustible sources of energy.

* LIVING MAJORITY: perennialism.

This is by no means a complete list of possible achievements of science. Now imagine if science had already discovered more of that list! Those who are not interested in changing the existing paradigm, WHAT WILL THEY DO??? Are these people interested in "moving science backwards"? And how delusional is such a T.Z. at all? ;)