[Archive! - page 474

 
Swetten:
I have no facts that it was actually a hack and no facts that it was done as so-called opposition PR or self-parody.

Right. And there was no Akunin, and there was no zhj and there was no lunch soon...
 
Mischek:

Yeah, well... And there was no Akunin, and he didn't have a zhj and lunch soon...
Why should I take his word for it?
 
Integer:

I'm not registered, I don't see any pages from there, and I've seen some before without registering, so I'm interested.


So far, everything's in place.

 
Swetten:
Why should I take his word for it?

Never mind, you don't have to do anything.
 

О! I told you -- the hack was a priori carried out by the evil Putinoids.

The level of intelligence of the opposition is clearly demonstrated.

If I don't like it, it's the machinations of the government.

If I like it, it's democracy.

 
Swetten:

Am I correct: you started by questioning the facts that Putin does not piss and conduct?

Let's not go off topic, let's present facts to the contrary in the studio.

No need to twist things around.

Personally, I don't have the slightest clue on the subject of "what Putin doesn't piss on". I also don't know what he pisses/pisses/will piss on.

 
Swetten:

О! I told you -- the hack was a priori carried out by the evil Putinoids.

The level of intelligence of the opposition is clearly demonstrated.

If I don't like it, it's the machinations of the government.

If I like it, it's democracy.


No, he hacked himself, for publicity's sake.

Sometimes I think you are a robot of light.

The level of intelligence of the opposition is clearly demonstrated.

It's the 100th time, it needs to be different, at least rearrange the words.
 
Swetten:

О! I told you -- the hack was a priori carried out by the evil Putinoids.

The level of intelligence of the opposition is clearly demonstrated.

If I don't like it, it's the government's machinations.

If I like it, it's democracy.

Well, it's exactly the opposite for you: it's all the work of the state-sponsored opposition.
 
PapaYozh:

There's no need to over-initiate.

Personally, I don't have the slightest idea on the subject of "What Putin doesn't piss on". Neither do I know what he pisses/pisses/will piss on.

I stated that Putin doesn't piss and conduct.

You asked, "Are you sure?" which sounds like doubt.

So you are twisting -- you.

P.S. That's it, I'm off to play poker.

 
Mischek:


No, he hacked himself, for publicity's sake of course.

I am not ruling that possibility out.

Again, why should I take his word for it?

This is the 100th time, it needs to be varied, at least rearrange the words.

That was irony at the bottom of the page you quoted.