![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Farnsworth
hello
With all the unnecessary arguments yesterday, I still did not ask - today I will ask -
Was the analysis based on assumptions-forecasts of macroeconomic indicators - if so, what were the results and what was the source of the data?
Farnsworth
hello
With all the unnecessary arguments yesterday, I still did not ask - today I will ask -
was the analysis based on assumed-forecast macroeconomic indicators - if so, what cuts and what was the source of the data?
Good morning.
Not at the moment. I have started to prepare the material for the study of this very impact. I am collecting data so far. I do not know what kind of model I will use yet, but probably I will start with a multivariate regression model.
PS: I don't think it will work that easily, I mean there may be very unobvious links :o(
Good morning.
Not now. Started preparing material for a study on this very influence. I'm collecting data now. I don't know what kind of model it will be yet, but I'll probably start with a multifactor regression model.
PS: I don't think it will be that easy, I mean very unobvious links may be present :o(
Good morning, everyone.
The more complex the system, the more details are missing. But we are not looking for easy ways :))
Goodbye, everybody.
But we don't look for easy ways:))
Yeah, I have an old friend from university. Once he solved a difficult problem in a slightly sub-optimal way, but he solved it correctly. The teacher demonstrated a more elegant solution, to which the friend said "well... we are not looking for easy ways". To which the teacher smiled slyly and replied smilingly - "that's why you don't find it".
:о)
The more complex the system, the more details are missing.
I can't always describe the world around us with a simple formula, or ratheryou can, but what you get is unlike anything else but this world :o(
Well, thank goodness, at least another scholastic argument about what TA is is over...
Yeah, I have an old friend from university. He once solved a difficult problem in a slightly sub-optimal way, but solved it correctly. The teacher demonstrated a more elegant solution, to which the friend said "well... we are not looking for easy ways". To which the teacher smiled slyly and replied smilingly - "that's why you don't find it".
:о)
I can't always describe the world around us by a simple formula, or ratheryou can, but what you get is unlike anything else but this world :o(
Sorry about that, but at school I used to do exactly the opposite.
At chemistry class I used to solve problems in 2 or 3 steps, but the textbook was supposed to solve them in 5 or 6, making the chemist very nervous. Eventually, she was reconciled, and at the same time stopped calling me to the blackboard - apparently not to pervert the young minds of his classmates. I was amused to watch her nervous tic after solving another problem. :D
Comrades do not understand polite treatment.
Tambov's wolves don't understand the scientific bleat.
There's a lull in the forecasts...
;)