Avalanche - page 263
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Вы забыли добавить: "Читайте внимательнее!", но я сделал это за Вас.
I haven't forgotten. The phrase is inappropriate for someone to whom I replied and he confirmed it.
I made minimal adjustments to the macro code and this is what I got:
All 10 experiments were carried out consecutively, row number 6 was knocked out of the group (I didn't delete it, so as to see this variant of events)
Actually there are 2 counters added to the code: for successful and for unsuccessful outcomes. When a counter reaches some value (I chose "5") its value is reset, and the stake changes (if the score reaches a maximum, the stake decreases by "1", and if the score fails - it increases by "1").
I.e. Martin's step is calculated from crossing the levels of the wandering grid?
It was done in other versions, I tried it both ways. I was not inspired... ))
And you can give me the number of initialization for row number 6 ? Let's see what makes it stand out.
I.e. Martin's step is calculated from the intersection of the wandering grid levels?
I've done it in other versions, I've done it both ways. I was not inspired... ))
And you can give me the number of initialization for row number 6 ? Let's see what makes it stand out.
50713,8203125In my opinion, this row has shifted the successful outcomes to the beginning and the unsuccessful ones to the end of the row, respectively.
I.e. Martin's step is calculated from the intersection of the wandering grid levels?
I've done it in other versions, I've done it both ways. I was not inspired... ))
No, the step remains equal to "1", but after a certain number of successful/unsuccessful outcomes we make an extra step.
50713,8203125
I think this row has a bias of successful outcomes towards the beginning and unsuccessful outcomes towards the end of the row.
Well, it's not a trend. I do not want to trade. ))
And the beginning is called the avalanche. (I mean Flat).
Guys, where's the pessimist branch?
I'll go and live there. I'll open an exchange office.
I'll call it... "Horns and hooves". Admission is by appointment.
None of the strategies are working. And Avalanche too... How to live?
Guys, where's the pessimist branch?
I'm gonna go and live there. I'm gonna open up an exchange office.
I'll call it... "Horns and hooves". Admission is by appointment.
Don't give up, it'll be hockey.Working hard. with small profits of the order of 5-10 percent a month. With occasional drains and periods of recovery...
This is about it:
1000
1010
980
1001
1030
1060
900
940
920
960
1030
1060
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
that's it... month closed... 6% profit... yay... we can drink cognac... That's how it is in the real world... and on other planets there's an avalanche... but we don't understand...
Не впадайте в уныние:) работает все... и стратегии работают... только надо голову включать... то что якобы гарантированно будет всегда давать прибыль - нге работает... и астрономических прибылей по 100 процентов за неделю - тоже не работает... и то что на плати.ру продается - тоже не работает.
Работает кропотливая работа. с небольшой прибылью порядка 5-10 процентов в месяц. С периодическими сливами и периодами восстановления...
Примерно так:
1000
1010
980
1001
1030
1060
900
940
920
960
1030
1060
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
все... месяц закрыли... 6% профита... ура... можем пить коньяк... Вот так бывает в реале... а на других планетах бывает лавина... но нам не понять
Why do you have a drawdown of one and a half times your profit? Your example is somewhat pessimistic. )