"The 'perfect' trading system - page 78
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
However, the optimizer didn't cheat :)
StopBase did not change -> NF sync with FR remained within range -> profits were not long in coming.
Current result of the adaptive Expert Advisor UmnickTrader V2M3P2 +569%.
So it's rapidly losing stability... Something should be done about it urgently!
Current result of UmnickTrader V2M3P2 adaptive advisor +569%.
A couple of questions:
1. What prevents showing such results on PAMM?
2. My last two trades opened in duplicate, as well as the previous ones, TP = 7 and 43 pips respectively. In this case, the SL is 161 points and if it were to work, the total loss with the lot 0.9 would take away all of the months of accumulated profit.
Doesn't it bother you? Because even though the SL is moved very far away from the current price compared to the TP, it will still trigger at some point. The lot is increasing and the risk to lose at least profit is not decreasing.
A couple of questions:
1. What prevents you from showing such results on a PAMM?
2. My last two trades opened in duplicate, as well as the previous ones, have TP = 7 and 43 pips respectively. In this case, the SL is 161 points and if it were to work, the total loss with the lot 0.9 would take away all of the months of accumulated profit.
Doesn't it bother you? Because even though the SL is moved very far away from the current price compared to the TP, it will still trigger at some point. The lot is increasing and the threat of losing at least profit is not decreasing.
1. PAMM is another project :)
2. See tests of the adaptive Expert Advisor
a) Stop losses work, but not very often
b) there are rather big gaps between stop losses
Consequently, if you are unlucky, after a period of losses, there is enough time to quickly increase the deposit several times, then withdraw the profit and withdraw the profit until you are lucky again. In total, there will be a profit. And whether the deposit will be lost or not is a matter of luck. After all, you can hold several deposits at the same time, with different settings - all at once will not be lost.
The last two trades opened in a duplicate
Actually, it is more correct to open positions not by a duplicate, but asynchronously - with a shift.
Commercial versions of adaptive EAs do just that.
1. PAMM is a different project :)
It would be very interesting to know about the objectives of this project
It would be very interesting to know about the aims of this project
Generally, I would like to hear back, as I am not yet on the ignore list
a) stop losses are triggered, but not very often
b) there are quite large gaps between stop-losses
Consequently, if you are unlucky, after a period of losses, there is enough time to quickly increase the deposit several times, then withdraw the profit and withdraw the profit until you are lucky again. In total, there will be a profit. And whether the deposit will be lost or not is a matter of luck. After all, you can hold several deposits at once, with different settings - all at once will not be lost.
Yes, I agree. If one is betting mainly on chance or bad luck, and investor's money is involved in trading, and there is no fear and advice to lose it,
then it is certainly possible to make money for oneself in this way. The same as in the sale of Expert Advisors. But this is not profit from the market, but from the pockets of investors/buyers.
Some kind of nirobny disease is going on, like "screen mania". In real life - it's a failure, but on screenshots everything is great.... Can we show the same thing, but only in real life, for example on pamm?
Yes, I agree. If the main bet is on luck or bad luck, and the trade involves mainly investor money and there is no fear or advice of losing it,
it is certainly possible to make money for oneself in this way. The same as in the sale of Expert Advisors. But this is not profit from the market, but from the pockets of investors/buyers.
There you go again, allegedly asking a question on the subject, and then immediately shifted the conversation to "conscience" :)
You're just a regular black PR guy, not a trader, as you take every opportunity to say something nasty.
Traders know very well that you cannot predict the future and with such risks you can lose your whole deposit.
Some kind of nirobny disease is going on, like "screen mania". In real life - a drain, but on screenshots all fine.... Can you show the same thing, but only in real life, for example on the pomme?