The fate of the world's currencies in the wake of the demise of the dollar. - page 18
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Now too, it is not acceptable for your thought to deviate from the general line of the "party", only on a global scale. Isn't it.
Who enjoys what is beyond the brackets.
Built - what is the ideological "staple"? The triumph of communism is no longer valid.
If you take apart any ideology, it will ultimately fail, so what is the point of pulling out one of them and using it as an example to clobber it.
Why do you not have such questions about other ideologies? If we are objective, we should take apart all the current ideologies and compare them, there won't be an ideal, but it's much closer to an equal conversation.
If you take apart any ideology, it will ultimately fail, so what is the point of pulling out one of them and using it as an example to clobber it.
Why do you not have such questions about other ideologies? If we are objective, we should take apart all the current ideologies and compare them, there won't be an ideal, but it's much closer to an equal conversation.
Well then there is nothing to build a common state?
There is, but it will be very much hampered. Because it will not fit into a competing parasitic ideology. Don't just ask me to describe a possible ideology. I can hardly describe an entire dissertation here.
And why, so that you, without understanding, in one phrase flushed everything down the toilet. I do not see the point in throwing beads, if a man is already decided everything for himself. I do not understand why he then asks for explanations, if initially there is no need for them.
The so-called "rights" and "individual freedom" these parasites have demonstrated in Iraq, Libya, Yugoslavia, all over the world -- it is the "right" to bomb, and the "freedom of these individuals" to kill for their own gain.
On individual rights and freedoms.
You mean the same level of individual rights and freedoms?
Well, in theory this would make unification easier, but it is not the reason for such unification. If we put the level of individual freedoms in the first place, then we should unite with Great Britain urgently.
The general level of freedoms is not enough to create a union state of Russia and RB, we also need cheap oil and cheap gas. But RB does not have much of either - what about the rest (if there are any)?
You mean the same level of individual rights and freedoms?
Well, in theory this would make unification easier, but it is not the reason for such unification. If we put the level of individual freedoms in the first place, then we should unite with Great Britain urgently.
The general level of freedoms is not enough to create a union state of Russia and RB, we also need cheap oil and cheap gas. But there is not much of that in RB either - what about the rest (if there are any)?
No. "Same", already implies settlement.
No, there needs to be an ideological or business basis for unification.
The USSR-1 had such a basis - the triumph of communism and the common sawing off of energy exports.
And now?
"Common history" won't work.