The fate of the world's currencies in the wake of the demise of the dollar. - page 17

 
Дмитрий:
where?
Pardon, confused with the offended sub-European.
 
Nikkk:
Pardon, confused with the offended sub-European.
Who?
 
Alexandr Saprykin:

Talk of the USSR:


More than half of Russians believe the collapse of the Soviet Union could have been avoided (51%) and regret that it happened (56%), the Levada Center told Interfax.

The proportion of Russians who are nostalgic about the Soviet era was the highest since November 2010, but the historical high is higher than today - in December 2000, three quarters of Russians (75%) regretted the collapse of the USSR.


At the same time, the number of those who were disheartened by the collapse of the Soviet Union decreased: 28% against 37% in November. However, 16% of respondents in a poll conducted on March 25-28, among 1,600 people in 137 localities of 48 Russian regions found it difficult to answer.

One-third (33%) of respondents said that the collapse of the USSR was inevitable. Seventeen percent were unable to formulate an answer.

As sociologists have found out, the majority of respondents (58%) would like to revive the Soviet Union and the social system, while 44% said it is unrealistic at present. At the same time, every third respondent (31%) would not want to restore the country of the Soviets.
https://news.mail.ru/society/25511196/?frommail=1

There's probably one slip-up here that makes these figures meaningless. It is very likely that the people are not nostalgic for the USSR, but only for their childhood.
 
Dmitry Fedoseev:
There was no music, no films, no books. The radio was jammed. There might have been Net, but not the Inter.

We are talking about what would be possible if...to this day...not about what wasn't there then (which, by the way, was also helped). And why it could not be now, if and to this day, is not clear.

No one is talking about the USSR as an ideal. But with transformation, rather than elimination, it might well have been otherwise.

 
Nikkk:
We're talking about what would be possible if...to this day...Not what wasn't there then (which, by the way, was also helped). And why it couldn't be now, if and to this day, is not clear.

Bummer.

Screencap

 
Nikkk:
We are talking about what would be possible if...to this day...not about what wasn't there then (which, by the way, was also helped). And why it could not be now, if...and to this day, is not clear.
You have built a new USSR-2. How will you hold it together? What is the ideological message? "The triumph of communism" has exhausted itself.
 
Nikkk:
We are talking about what would be possible if...to this day...not about what wasn't there then (which, by the way, was also helped). Why it could not be now, if and to this day, is not clear.
Because it was unacceptable for your thought to deviate from the party's general line.
 
Дмитрий:
You've built a new USSR-2. How will you hold it together? What is the ideological message? "The triumph of communism" has exhausted itself.
The ideology of parasitizing weaker countries so that these countries cannot compete is probably more palatable to you. I don't.
 
Nikkk:
The ideology of parasitizing weaker countries, so that these countries cannot compete, is probably more pleasing to you. I don't.

Who enjoys what is beyond the brackets.

Built - what is the ideological "staple"? The triumph of communism is no longer valid.

 
Dmitry Fedoseev:
Because it was unacceptable for your thought to deviate from the general line of the party.
Now it is not acceptable for your thought to deviate from the general line of the "party" either, only on a global scale. Isn't it.