How do I create a function to process each millisecond? - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
A film camera simply shows frames at 24 frames per second, there's no interlaced scanning, it's a stupid frame change. Why are you arguing about something you don't understand?
Film was 10-12 frames too, I told you about Chaplin)
But the frequency will still be 25Hz because the half-frame is output at 25Hz and the previous half-frame, which has already been output, is still displayed on the TV screen due to the "pixel decay time".
the frequency is 50 Hz - as in a socket
film and 10-12 shots was, I told you about Chaplin)
I've already written that Chaplin's films don't have a natural uniformity of movement.
This would correspond to 12 frames per second - not enough to convey the natural fluidity of movement.
That's why 50 half frames is smoother and clearer than 24 full frames
that's why 50 half frames is smoother and clearer than 24 full frames
It's a solution to the problem of flicker, not the naturalness of motion.
This is a solution to the problem of flicker, not the naturalness of motion.
Read about de-interlacing
Read about de-interlacing
If anyone should read something, it's you, something about the basics of cinema and television, at least at a child's level.
This would correspond to 12 frames per second - not enough to convey the natural smoothness of the movements.
Well, it depends on the dynamics on the source video, if, for example, you output slow motion of a snail, then I think 3-4 frames per second would look the same as 24 frames/sec.
Well it depends on the dynamics on the source video, if for example you output a slow motion snail, then I think even 3-4 fps would look the same as 24 fps
Pictured... Tomorrow, one day only, in all cinemas in the city the new Hollywood blockbuster "Snail", hurry up, don't miss it, first viewers discounts!
Maybe it would be enough if all the movies were about snails... but there are problems with them too, they sometimes pop up quickly, sometimes fall quickly and sink, sometimes they let out an air bubble.
Well it depends on the dynamics on the source video, if for example you output a slow motion snail, then I think 3-4 fps would look the same as 24 fps
I agree with Dmitry. There is a limit to human perception. This limit is obvious - 24 fps. That is if you "stuff" more frames, a person will not notice the difference. He'll only notice it if he slows down the speed of the film. So it's back to 24 frames again.