A man has become a billionaire. What is his purpose in life now? - page 16
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What is the point of creating a second breed? It will spoil the landscape. ))
The second breed will live outside the MKAD, and inside the MKAD there will be a border booth with a sign saying "Russia, entry by pass".
The mob that has taken over the world intends to create two, unbreedable breeds of humans: one of them is their beloved called sentient man, living for five hundred years or more. And the second breed is the rest of humanity, called the human-bee, living no more than thirty years.
They got the idea from sci-fi writer Efremov. "It's called Bull Hour.
On a more serious note, they are focused on shrinking the world's population.
They will abolish, the mob that has seized power over the world intends to create two, unbreakable breeds of humans: one of them is their beloved called sentient man, living for five hundred years or more. And the second breed is the rest of humanity, called the human-bee, living no more than thirty years.
I support you!) As Huxley says in "Brave New World" "(2) breed is called there - epsiloids)) Although there are many places where such ideas are developed. Did you get that from science fiction or did you come to those conclusions yourself? I also believe that in connection with robotization--the majority will be redundant---some part of the epsiloids who are controlled and performcertain functions will be left, but the masses are not needed--they are still being held--as they support the electorate. They do not know how to get rid of them - they are raising the retirement age. They do not need them because they are a low-skilled labour force and they are nothing but trouble - they should be indulged and held back all the time. They would clean them up in the usual way - with a knife (wars, etc.)) or maybe they would launch a selective virus.)
(I support you!) As Huxley said in "Brave New World" "(2) breed is called there - epsiloids)) Although many places develop such ideas. Did you get that from science fiction or did you come to those conclusions yourself? I also believe that in connection with robotization--the majority will be redundant---some part of the epsiloids who are controlled and performcertain functions will be left, but the masses are not needed--they are still being held--as they support the electorate. They do not know how to get rid of them - they are raising the retirement age. They do not need them because they are a low-skilled labour force and they are nothing but trouble - they should be indulged and held back all the time. They would clean them up in the usual way - with a knife (wars, etc.)) or maybe they would launch a selective virus.)
There is no need to invent anything, the model of effective development of society under market conditions was designed long ago and implemented in most developed countries, where billionaires and other segments of society successfully coexist. Billionaires are happy and proud of the fact that they help the rest of the society to organize the worthy life and high standard of living by means of the exact system of progressive taxation and the developed system of social security. The name of this model is real capitalism, where the principle is: above profits, only honour. Why doesn't it work in the post-soviet space? Because we did not get the principle of capitalism in its entirety, namely the just distribution of material goods created by a society through a progressive taxation of billionaires, by which we mean the well-off people in the society. They must understand that without basic social stratum they could never become billionaires. Therefore, the billionaire's further goal is to increase his fortune for more stable development of the society, being aware and proud of the fact that he has also contributed to the progress of the society.
There is no need to invent anything, the model of efficient development of society under market conditions has long been invented and implemented in most developed countries, where both billionaires and other strata of society successfully coexist. Billionaires are happy and proud of the fact that they help the rest of the society to organize the worthy life and high standard of living by means of the exact system of progressive taxation and the developed system of social security. The name of this model is real capitalism, where the principle applies: There is no profit but honour. Why doesn't it work in the post-soviet space? Because we did not get the principle of capitalism in its entirety, namely the just distribution of material goods created by a society through a progressive taxation of billionaires, by which we mean the well-off people in the society. They must understand that without basic social stratum they could never become billionaires. So, the main goal of a billionaire is to increase his wealth for the stable development of the society, realizing and proud of the fact that he has contributed to the progress of the society.
Yes - you are an ardent utopian)
Yes - you are an ardent utopian)
This is not a utopia but an objective reality. We just haven't lived under real capitalism yet.
This is not a utopia, but an objective reality. It's just that we haven't lived under real capitalism yet.
Read Thatcher's statement, it's a bit distorted, but the essence is the same. Now we're already seeing the process of ...
Read Thatcher's statement, it's a bit distorted, but the point is the same. Now we are already seeing the process of...
Which Thatcher statement, please cite the source.
Which, exactly, is Thatcher's statement, cite the source, please.
Here, but there are many from the hu..... of this world
There is no need to invent anything, the model of efficient development of society under market conditions has long been invented and implemented in most developed countries, where both billionaires and other strata of society successfully coexist. Billionaires are happy and proud of the fact that they help the rest of society to organise a decent life and a high standard of living by means of a clear system of progressive taxation and a well-developed social security system.
What kind of decent living and high standard of living does a developed country have on social welfare? Where is the firewood coming from? The development of society is out of the question.