I am plagued by questions of the universe - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Not sure about 'comparable', but yes, the Doppler effect. Only who says it's a shift and not their true 'colour', eh?
"colour" is, in astronomy, a shift and only a shift.
Colourful Hubble telescope photos are hand painted in different colours on Earth depending on the chemical composition
Stopped by this site, bored. No interesting topics. It used to be more interesting. So I decided to diversify the topics a bit. That's why I can't calm down with such incomprehensible worldviews. Maybe somebody can help me understand it.
Misunderstanding #1. Scientists say the universe is expanding, galaxies are scattering in different directions. What about the stars - are they going apart too...? So we're all expanding, our atoms are scattering, etc. But if everything in the universe is growing in size, then our ruler, which we use to measure the distance, is also growing in proportion to everything. So any distance measured by our growing ruler does not change. Thus, it is impossible to measure the expansion of the Universe, as any standard (ruler) of such measurement also grows. It turns out that the universe is not expanding, at least from the point of view of an observer inside this universe. Maybe someone can clarify. Then I will ask the second, more difficult question.
Let me explain. There is a macro world and a micro world. The laws of one do not by default carry over to the laws of the other.
At the molecular level, there are forces of both repulsion and attraction... The more the molecules (of the same body (substance)) are farther apart, the more strongly they are attracted to each other...
The so called intermolecular interaction forces. This is a high school and university physics course.
Let me explain. There is a macro world and a micro world. The laws of one do not, by default, apply to the laws of the other.
At the molecular level, there are forces of both repulsion and attraction... The more the molecules are farther apart, the more they are attracted to each other...
So-called intermolecular interaction forces. This is a high school and university physics course.
It may turn out to be much sadder than that, namely that our macrocosm is a microcosm for someone else's set of processes. And so on to infinity.
Let me explain. There is a macro world and a micro world. Laws of one do not by default carry over to laws of the other.
At the molecular level, there are forces of both repulsion and attraction... The more the molecules (of the same body (substance)) are farther apart, the more strongly they are attracted to each other...
The so-called intermolecular interaction forces. This is a school and university physics course.
OOO. How's that?
It's probably sexual attraction that's meant... Sort of like this....
A huge, huge METAGALAXIC...
And on the edge of it nestles the muzzled Milky Way.
The lost solar system...
Big Earth.
In the middle of a vast ocean a huge continent.
Wide river flows and on its shore there is a lot of sand.
Lying in the sand is a green, green crocodile.
He is lying in the sand, basking in the sun and is suffering: *"What's the point of all this?!
CONCLUSION
)
Let me explain. There's a macro world and a micro world. The laws of one do not by default carry over to the laws of the other.
At the molecular level, there are forces of both repulsion and attraction... The more the molecules (of the same body (substance)) are farther apart, the more they are attracted to each other...
The so called intermolecular interaction forces. This is a school and university physics course.
Roma, you read it too. Hans Christian Andersen wrote physics. Since about eighth grade. :)
And about how matter adheres to each other, and about how positively charged protons in the nucleus somehow fucking hold together (and in theory should repel)...
And even about the fact that a thermal neutron collapses the nucleus but a high-energy one does not...
I quote:
Not sure about 'comparable', but yes, the Doppler effect. Only who's to say it's a shift and not their true 'colour', eh?
Maybe so, but a more acceptable one hasn't been thought of yet. It's the most reasonable explanation for something that perhaps humanity cannot yet grasp).....
Crocodile Vasya!
Zray, Patheson!