MT4 doesn't have long to live - page 25
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No problem.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/job
Any whim for your money.
;)
:-) I'm sorry... I'm capable of a lot of things myself...
The point is a programming bias in the development of the terminal. The conversation started with the tester, which the developers proudly call a "strategy tester". I and some others in this thread claim that the tester doesn't test any strategies - it's a cool specific program debugger. As an example, I gave that the tester doesn't answer the question about stability of TS. And other examples.
Start with yourself, i.e. answer a trivial question: what do you think is a stable trading system?
Possibly. So join the methaquotv team - and make your own constructive additions.
Start with yourself, i.e. answer the trivial question: what do you think is a stable trading system?
I answer questions if I can't find an answer in books. If you like, I can quote you, although I think I did it for you personally.
In the "Econometrics: one step ahead forecast" thread I not only answered the question, but also cited results from the field.
What is your question about?
No, I am generally satisfied with the mt5 system and I don't want the mt5 project to stop, of course there are difficulties with the historical data, but not about that
If in the Strategy Tester there was a ticker "use MT4 compatibility mode" which would set two opposite orders with 0 volume instead of closing a position at opening a counter order, then maybe the problem would disappear.00, maybe there would be no questions from inexperienced users "why lots don't exist, bring back lots!", I don't have problems with MT5, well, almost none...
The point is that while developing complex systems it's critically important to keep architecture clean, without letting crutches kill it. A small crutch in one part of a complex like a terminal starts to sprawl and grow, killing the server architecture and operations processing. Not everyone understands what it means to combine two mutually exclusive trading models in one system. However, it is enough to sit down, write down all the processing on paper, and then be horrified by the consequences.
This is why we have rewritten our systems 5 times from scratch, although it is an extremely dangerous method. The result is either to perish or to make a cool thing.
Possibly. So join the methaquotv team - and make your own constructive additions.
I don't care about the dick.
Why does MT5, a priori, equalise two differently directed positions, of the same volume, of two different TS? Do the developers know my MM, trading logic of systems?
If you have a trade system in place, then the same order will be placed in the same position in the same volume in the same trader.
I answer questions if I can't find an answer in books. If you like, I can quote you, although I think I did it for you personally.
In the "Econometrics: one step ahead forecast" thread I not only answered the question, but also gave results from the field.
What is your question about?
Once again for the particularly gifted econometricians: give a definition of a stable trading system. We, illiterate traders, still do not know what it is, since we have not seen such systems in our eyes, including in the above-mentioned thread.
They have seen unstable ones, but there are always some problems with stable ones: either they have drawdowns or Kolya gives them a peek.
Therefore the question for us is not an idle one. Therefore, we ask this econometrician so well versed in books to give a clear and unambiguous answer to this very small question.
Thank you for trying to employ me.
Very curious. What do you think the model and scenario for the next two systems will be, at least approximately: