The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 142

 
yosuf:
We should calculate by P(t;n;t)


that is, instead of B(t;n;t) use P(t;n;t) --- right?

.

.

Yusuf, explain in detail how you see it, how do you think it should be, how should the calculation be organised?

 

or maybe like this:

.

Or like this:

 

But it's better this way:

.

but it's definitely not P()

 
avtomat:

But it's better this way:

.

but it's definitely not P()

The function P(t;n;t) describes the quarter period of a sine well, you need to think about how to describe the whole sine in a similar way. And the tangent function accurately describes, moreover, predicts its characteristic points early in the data input, perfectly demonstrating the predictive ability of P https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/140329. Description of the forward and reverse exponent https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/140329/page20, normal distribution https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/140329/page25
 
yosuf:
The function P(t;n;t) describes the quarter period of a sine well, you need to think about how to describe the whole sine in a similar way. And the tangent function accurately describes, moreover, predicts its characteristic points early in the data input, perfectly demonstrating the predictive ability of P https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/140329. Description of the forward and reverse exponent https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/140329/page20, normal distribution https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/140329/page25


How is the counting done there? Extrapolation? Or just a correction at each step?

 
avtomat:


How is the counting done there? Is it extrapolated? Or just a correction at each step?

For example, for a tangent, the values of the function are entered through equal values of x in radians to the input of the P function.
 
yosuf:
For example, for a tangent, the values of the function are entered through equal values of x in radians to the input of the function P.


At each step? But that's not correct. What is of interest here is extrapolation.

For example, in my drawings you can see that on counts 2-3-4-5 the parameters are calculated, and from the sixth count onwards the result is extrapolated. The discrepancy is visible to the naked eye.

 

You're both being petty. Look at the root of it.

Continued: http://youtu.be/ClFdYeo6kj4

>
 
MetaDriver:

You're both being petty. Look at the bottom line.



I dispute this fact:

In philosophy, it is an irreversible current (flowing in only one direction - from the past, through the present to the future)[2] within which all processes existing in being that are facts.

2- https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%8F#.D0.9A.D0.BE.D0.BD.D1.86.D0.B5.D0.BF.D1.86.D0.B8.D0.B8_.D0.B2.D1.80.D0.B5.D0.BC.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.B8

My point of view:

In philosophy, it is an irreversible current (flowing in only one direction - from the future, through the present to the past)[2] within which all the processes existing in being that are facts take place.

Moreover, it is possible, as you mentioned earlier, to suppose that the present does not exist at all - it is half in history and half not yet. What is the present? It is processes that take place in a unit of time. If we take millennia as a unit, the present is 1 millennium; if seconds, the present is 1 second.

 
yosuf:

I dispute this fact

In philosophy, it is an irreversible current (flowing in only one direction - from the past, through the present to the future)[2] within which all processes existing in being that are facts.

2- https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%8F#.D0.9A.D0.BE.D0.BD.D1.86.D0.B5.D0.BF.D1.86.D0.B8.D0.B8_.D0.B2.D1.80.D0.B5.D0.BC.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.B8

My point of view:

In philosophy, it is an irreversible current (flowing in only one direction - from the future, through the present to the past)[2] within which all the processes existing in being that are facts take place.

The point is not the direction of flow. The conventional representation of the flow of time can (and does) differ from culture to culture.

Moreover, it is possible, as you mentioned earlier, to assume that the present does not exist at all - it is half in history and half not there yet. What is the present? It is processes that take place in a unit of time. If we take millennia as a unit, the present is 1 millennium; if seconds, the present is 1 second.

The unit of measurement should not affect the definition of Absolute Present Time. Because by definition it is relative.

There are more subtle attempts at definition. According to Einstein, for example, Present Time is the time interval between sending a test signal and receiving a response. Ping but our... :)

// Watch Kalinauskas to the end ! !!