[Archive! - page 363
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Today, demonstrators tried to stop a PAZZ with OMON, they thought there were detainees there, but there were guys with helmets and clubs.) It was funny.
approach to the lubyanka
http://pit.dirty.ru/lepro/2/2011/12/05/32458-073105-92a65665b7d099dfb0e72a636651fd0a.jpg
In fact, if the riot police work competently, dispersing a crowd of a few thousand is no problem.
What is needed is a few tens of thousands, good organisation and flexible management.
In one shot .
genius shot
Why don't we organise our own party? Just like that on the internet. The costs are minimal, not even a membership fee. Make a beautiful website, hold a constituent conference online, elect a party committee, apply for registration. And the next election, we're gonna kick the crap out of everybody.)
And that would be the right thing to do.
Whoever has never been an observer in an election at any level cannot understand the public mood first hand, so to speak.
Having been through a few elections, one realises that falsifications cannot have a significant impact on the overall election results and the question of falsification for an observer disappears of its own accord. Those who haven't seen it are seeing boxes and trucks of forged ballots. Most of the forum folks know how to work the numbers and understand what we are talking about.
The question of the popularity of the party is the ability to work with the masses on a daily and hourly basis.
And always in the public's favour.
But in practice, the existing politicians only seek the support of the masses to assert their narrowly self-serving goals no more.
Human greed is immeasurable, and politicians are not excluded, going with high flags first.
...