"Trees don't grow to the sky" - page 57

 

I was wondering, by the way, if take-off speed is related to take-off longevity?

Maybe the lower the speed, the longer the takeoff time? Or is there no such correlation?

 
LeoV:
Most likely related, as in the case of the price change.
 
DmitriyN: Most likely related, as in the case of the price change.
The question is how?
 
I was thinking about something else, to what extent is the fall related to a chain withdrawal of funds from the PAMM by investors. Suppose there was a severe drawdown, more than planned. Then one investor withdraws funds, then another, then a third one.
But the system continues working with former lot sizes. The drawdown grows geometrically. The result - draining of the deposit. Crowd psychology again.
 
DmitriyN: I was thinking about something else, to what extent is the drop related to the chain withdrawal of funds from PAMM by investors. Suppose, there was a severe drawdown, more than planned. Then one investor withdraws funds, then another, then a third one.
But the system continues working with former lot sizes. The drawdown grows geometrically. The result - draining of the deposit. Crowd psychology again.

Well it's first grade, second quarter ))) -

1. the lots should be changed with the change of the depo, so that the load does not change - for this in the correct brokerage companies a special time is given )))).

2. Usually, returns are shown without taking into account the size of the depo (inputs).

 
LeoV:

_ Lots need to be changed with the change in the depot _

You have to, but it is not always possible to do it in time.
 
DmitriyN: You have to, but it is not always possible to do it in time.
It may not be possible to close an old pose and open a new one )))
 
LeoV:
A wonderful take-off))) How high does it go? 3000% max.

He takes off competently.

super scalper 500 times :) He went from 30 to 160k (50000) in a couple of months, and he's always withdrawing money. He's got 160k on his account, and 300k in his pocket. That's not bad :)

 
LeoV:
It may not be possible to close an old pose and open a new one )))
It is not always wise to do so.
 
DmitriyN:
It is not always wise to do so.


What do you mean by reasonable/unreasonable?

If open positions are in deficit and new investors transfer profit to the account, then, if the volume of positions remains the same, the former investors will not receive the expected return on the profit when closing a set of trades later - in profit.

For a manager - if the positions in drawdown are not corrected, then in case of withdrawal of a significant part of PAMM's money (the same 20-30%), without adjustment of the position volume after the roll, the probability of another meeting of the account with a certain Nikolay is significantly increased... :-)

Also, according to forum information, you should always correct traded volumes immediately after a roll. There are appropriate Expert Advisors for this purpose.