Crisis: Don't we care? - page 70
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Oops - Timbo - come on. Lots of examples of how the award was given - and then it turned out that the theses were wrong. You asked Juric for proof - he put it out - then admit that you are wrong in this case - and you're clinging to words again. Don't twist things around.
Where is the proof? He didn't produce any evidence, but you're sure there was some.
An article on the subject of evidence and belief in evidence - Sociology of Lies - http://www.ej.ru/?a=note&id=8789
And here's an unexpectedly funny article on the crisis and Russia - Putin in Canossa - http://www.ej.ru/?a=note&id=8790
There is another theory about the crisis - the Arabs were selling oil to the Americans - and the dollars invested in the US economy - then Binladen shook hands and all the sheikhs started to take their money - a hole in liquidity appeared and the stock market collapsed - i.e. an economic terrorist attack on the West :)
No... I was the one who farted in August. It's happened before too...
Where is the proof? He didn't produce any evidence, but you're sure there was some.
An article on the subject of evidence and belief in evidence - Sociology of Lies - http://www.ej.ru/?a=note&id=8789
And here's an unexpectedly funny article on the crisis and Russia - Putin in Canossa - http://www.ej.ru/?a=note&id=8790
Latynina rules. As many years I read and listen I can't understand how she manages to digest such volume of information, and such closeness to sources on the whole informational spectrum, although in my opinion, economics is not her strongest point.
I started analysing the crisis back in July 2007, and my opinion on the causes has changed several times.
Latynina rules. For so many years I have been reading and listening to her, I cannot understand how she manages to digest so much information, and such proximity to sources across the information spectrum, although in my view, economics is not her strongest point.
I've started to analyse the crisis as far back as July 2007 and my opinion about the reasons has changed several times.
Her analysis is not important at all. What matters are the facts. Even if they are biased. But these are facts, they can easily be verified. And these facts are just screaming.
Her analysis is not important at all. It is the facts that matter. Even if they are biased. But they are facts, they can easily be verified. And those facts scream.
>> I agree, of course.
the facts there Latynina says are blatant, where are the facts? and these are the facts?!
- ein und zwantzich = firm und zibtzich!
puna mützike from politics
)))
pyramid. CDOs began to collapse in 2007 and eventually pulled the CDS down with them in 2008. Stiglitz, another Nobel laureate, once criticised this design and warned of its dangers. So who is the smart one and who is the laureate ?
the facts there you say Latynina has blatant, where are the facts? and these are the facts?!
- ein und zwantzich = fir und zibtzich!
Pune mützike from politics
)))
So you think that Latynina came up with the PACE resolution and Medvedev didn't fly to Bulgaria?