The fate of the world's currencies in the wake of the demise of the dollar. - page 57
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What kind of perverted taste is it to compare Sketman and Noggano in one space? I have a lot to learn from you, Alexander. Redneck rap - look in my eyes, you'll see the "depth" there, look in my eyes (bold, redneck) - this is Russia. I am Russia. Was that meaning put there?
Why, curiously, did the topic of the grave of the dollar turn to the rubbish about Russia? Are these two topics really related? Are rou-hackers, rou-mafia, rou-Putin and the rest of the rou-poor really the main factor in the quid's funeral?
... Why are you all messing with your citizens' heads with the rouble? You'll just write on every exchange office: "It's more convenient and profitable to keep it in dollars".
...
No one is steaming at anyone. It has long been officially announced that the rouble would depreciate in a planned manner and whoever wanted to convert their spare cash into euros and dollars long ago. Many countries periodically depreciate their currencies. This stimulates the development of companies which sell their products abroad and also enables the state to save foreign currency.
There is nothing nastier than dilettantes picking up the top tips from economics.
If an amateur keeps quiet, he's a good one.
Turnover in currency, buying up US debts ?
What debts, trade turnover?
2
1, 2
The funny thing is that for all the "omnipotence" of the states it is very easy to bring them down to earth, all they have to do is refuse to use the dollar to other countries. Even more amusing is that the states cannot do the same to bring down the economy of, say, Russia.
No economy, no state. In fact, the entire power of the states is based on the ubiquitous payment in dollars and nothing more. The states' economy is as vulnerable as Kashchei the Immortal's life is to a needle. The states economy itself cannot exist locally using dollars, everything is based on the influx of surplus value on the use of dollars in other countries, not on the efficiency of the domestic economy.
It's like a mosquito sitting on the body of an elephant, imagining itself to be the all-powerful ruler of the world. The elephant cannot get rid of the bloodsucker, it cannot reach the mosquito. But another elephant can help, the blow will be painful for the donor elephant, but it will heal quickly.
No money flowing into the economy (with no surplus value in the economy itself) - no armaments, no scientific progress, no nothing - back to the Stone Age.The funny thing is that for all the "omnipotence" of the states it is very easy to bring them down to earth, all they have to do is refuse to use the dollar to other countries. Even more amusing is that the states cannot do the same to bring down the economy of, say, Russia.
No economy, no state. In fact, the entire power of the states is based on the ubiquitous payment in dollars and nothing more. The states' economy is as vulnerable as Kashchei the Immortal's life is to a needle. The states economy itself cannot exist locally using dollars, everything is based on the influx of surplus value on the use of dollars in other countries, not on the efficiency of the domestic economy.
It's like a mosquito sitting on the body of an elephant, imagining itself to be the all-powerful ruler of the world. The elephant cannot get rid of the bloodsucker on its own, it cannot reach the mosquito. But another elephant can help, the blow will be painful for the donor elephant, but it will get better quickly.