I have been charged, where do I find out what for? - page 47

[kylinar2012]

Integer:
And also, you literate man, where on any page is the word "autonomous"? Not in the description, not in the reviews, not in the discussion, not in "what's new". And where, our educated one, have you ever seen in MT5 autonomous charts?

And if you're so smart, show me where in my TOR says Autonomous? Are you just trolling?

[Dmitry Fedoseev]

kylinar2012:
And if you're so smart, show me where in my TOR it says Autonomous? Are you just trolling?

In the application you wrote the name of the mql4 file which needs to be rewritten.

And don't lie that you would be satisfied if instead of a period converter that creates autonomous charts you get just an indicator (like on that link in the market).

[kylinar2012]

sandex:
That's the problem, special yes, but standard no way.

I'm not arguing, but you wouldn't know unless you asked, because I'm not an expert.

I asked the specialists (executors) if it is possible, three of them told me, and offered to do the work, why should I doubt their opinion?

[kylinar2012]

Integer:

In the application, the name of the mql4 file was written which needs to be rewritten.

And don't lie that you would be satisfied if instead of a period converter that creates autonomous charts you get just an indicator (like on that link in the market).

You're trolling again and there's no such thing, it's written in the assignment that the functionality should be similar.

And what am I lying about, if I explicitly said when posting that I wouldn't care, as long as I could hang simple indicators and EAs on it, which I have an EA doing in MT4.

[Vasiliy Smirnov]

kylinar2012:

So I say that your adequacy is not all right.

Firstly, it is a chart(for the especially clueless, the developer has even put it in the name).

Secondly, it can hang indicators and advisors, but only specially written ones (read the description).

I wanted the same thing, but only to be able to hang ordinary indicators, not special. I am not a programmer to determine whether it is possible or not.

What will it be an indicator, a script or an Expert Advisor, I don't give a damn.

You said that my TOR was insulting and not feasible and I had to withdraw 100%, not 5. I understand the slip, the post was deleted, but it was there and it was seen. And if you say it was not, then you are, sorry, also a liar.

I do not intend to engage in further punctuation with you, because your aim is obvious.

I was telling the truth, my purpose was only that, I didn't mean to insult you in any way. And how much you took it and started insulting me is your problem. And you continue to do so, but that's a disservice only to you.

The program you have specified is an indicator, you can go as far as possible, charts in five are impossible - it's easy to check just by installing this indicator. If you write illiterate initially, then excuse me, but the developer begins to deal with you only after the agreement of works, until that time it is too expensive to give you free advice. As I said your inflated requirements increased the cost of the work, so the programmer is not to blame. And you paid for the use of the service.

[kylinar2012]

Integer:
What's written on the barn.

So what does it say on the barn?

[Dmitry Fedoseev]

kylinar2012:

Trolling again and there's no such thing, it's written in the job description that the functionality should be similar.

And why would I lie if I explicitly said when posting that I don't care, as long as I can hang simple indicators and EAs on it, which is what I have an EA doing in MT4.

Do you know what trolling is, and how do you have such an understanding background?

Saw this application - https://www.mql5.com/ru/job/11931. That's one.

And two - "functionality".

Three - "hang simple indicators and EAs"

[Dmitry Fedoseev]

kylinar2012:
So what does it say on the barn?

I see, you don't know what it says on the barn. You could have answered the question straightforwardly, "I don't know."

[kylinar2012]

Integer:
I see, you don't know what it says on the barn. You could have answered the question straight away - "I don't know".

You need to eat a lot of peas to communicate with you. A few posts about the shed and no answer. I'll ignore you from now on. You can practice your verbiage elsewhere.

[Dmitry Fedoseev]

kylinar2012:
You need to eat peas to communicate with you. A few posts about the shed and no response. I hereby ignore you from now on. Practice your rhetoric elsewhere.

If you don't have the brains to read the answers and understand them, sure.

kylinar2012:
...I'm ignoring you...

Does it really hurt your eyes?

* * *

Oh, man... Instead of something substantive, the topic of the barn is chosen.