Harmonic Analysis - page 103

[lobogabor]

USDCHF H4/D1 my current pics

[carbonmimetic]

paulselvan:
hi carbonmimetic why do you favor these time ratio,specially in this case...and whats going happen.

I watch for clusters of time ratios...and 78.6 is very important (square root of 61.8.....square root of 78.6 give s us 88.6..it is math...)

70.7 derives from square root of 2 and its inverse....

[Aki Miu]

EURGBP daily - C leg of a potential bearish cypher may be forming. There's previous support between 127.2 and 141.4 fibo levels. It may be a good chance to enter agg C.

[Aki Miu]

USDCAD hourly - Potential bullish N200. The pair seems to be consolidating.

[lobogabor]

carbonmimetic:
AUDUSD time frame 1H.

78.6% swing YZ

70.7% swing XY from Z

if AUDUSD will go up:

88% swing YZ

78.6% swing XY from Z

I do not see a potential pattern, the only one I could imagine there, is a shark with prz at 78-113% fib of your YZ = the shark XC leg if there is one (I have to measure internal fibs).

At the Y level you might expect a reaction of course.

If you take the previous impulse leg down probably the one ending in X, one might look for a reacton at a fib ret 78.6/88.6 of that as well, I would look for confluences..

[Aki Miu]

EURCHF H4 - Potential bearish crab.

[carbonmimetic]

carbonmimetic:
AUDUSD time frame 1H.

78.6% swing YZ

70.7% swing XY from Z

if AUDUSD will go up:

88% swing YZ

78.6% swing XY from Z

well,

at the first cluster AUDUSD stops uptrend and declined-trading range for 1 h,then go up again.

at the second cluster AUDUSD stops uptrend and declines for 7h

[paul selvan]

hi ryushin,

many thinks change fastly..i ddint have the latest navaroo ratios

can 0.618/1.13/1.27/0.786 be a Navaro one?

..or this 0.618/1.13/1.41/0.886 could be one ?

*there is a mistake on screenshot 1.14 -> 1.41

[paul selvan]

hi ryushin ,

should time XB = time BD be necessary for a valid navaro?

[Aki Miu]

paulselvan:
hi ryushin, many thinks change fastly..i ddint have the latest navaroo ratios can 0.618/1.13/1.27/0.786 be a Navaro one? ..or this 0.618/1.13/1.41/0.886 could be one ? *there is a mistake on screenshot 1.14 -> 1.41

paulselvan:
hi ryushin , should time XB = time BD be necessary for a valid navaro?

Take a look at the pic below. This is what I follow to draw N200. You can test 78.6, 88.6 even 100 AB. I tested 23.6 for AB and it's fine.