You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
USDCHF H4/D1 my current pics
hi carbonmimetic why do you favor these time ratio,specially in this case...and whats going happen.
I watch for clusters of time ratios...and 78.6 is very important (square root of 61.8.....square root of 78.6 give s us 88.6..it is math...)
70.7 derives from square root of 2 and its inverse....
EURGBP daily - C leg of a potential bearish cypher may be forming. There's previous support between 127.2 and 141.4 fibo levels. It may be a good chance to enter agg C.
USDCAD hourly - Potential bullish N200. The pair seems to be consolidating.
AUDUSD time frame 1H.
78.6% swing YZ
70.7% swing XY from Z
if AUDUSD will go up:
88% swing YZ
78.6% swing XY from ZI do not see a potential pattern, the only one I could imagine there, is a shark with prz at 78-113% fib of your YZ = the shark XC leg if there is one (I have to measure internal fibs).
At the Y level you might expect a reaction of course.
If you take the previous impulse leg down probably the one ending in X, one might look for a reacton at a fib ret 78.6/88.6 of that as well, I would look for confluences..
EURCHF H4 - Potential bearish crab.
AUDUSD time frame 1H.
78.6% swing YZ
70.7% swing XY from Z
if AUDUSD will go up:
88% swing YZ
78.6% swing XY from Zwell,
at the first cluster AUDUSD stops uptrend and declined-trading range for 1 h,then go up again.
at the second cluster AUDUSD stops uptrend and declines for 7h
hi ryushin,
many thinks change fastly..i ddint have the latest navaroo ratios
can 0.618/1.13/1.27/0.786 be a Navaro one?
..or this 0.618/1.13/1.41/0.886 could be one ?
*there is a mistake on screenshot 1.14 -> 1.41
hi ryushin ,
should time XB = time BD be necessary for a valid navaro?
hi ryushin, many thinks change fastly..i ddint have the latest navaroo ratios can 0.618/1.13/1.27/0.786 be a Navaro one? ..or this 0.618/1.13/1.41/0.886 could be one ? *there is a mistake on screenshot 1.14 -> 1.41
hi ryushin , should time XB = time BD be necessary for a valid navaro?
Take a look at the pic below. This is what I follow to draw N200. You can test 78.6, 88.6 even 100 AB. I tested 23.6 for AB and it's fine.