Human traders had long participated in financial markets before the rise of computers, developing rules of thumb that guided their decisions. In this article, we revisit a well-known breakout strategy to test whether such market logic, learned through experience, can hold its own against systematic methods. Our findings show that while the original strategy produced high accuracy, it suffered from instability and poor risk control. By refining the approach, we demonstrate how discretionary insights can be adapted into more robust, algorithmic trading strategies.