What to feed to the input of the neural network? Your ideas... - page 22
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's an elementary question that most traders know the answer to....
The same way a position is opened according to an algorithm, the same way a position is closed - also according to an algorithm....
Naturally, these algorithms do not coincide..., although it is quite possible that they may coincide.....
And this is the ONLY correct decision, as it is based on the market itself, and not on the psychic abilities of the trader, who invented rakes (in the form of SL and TP).....
if you close a position according to the algorithm, why can't SL and TP be set according to the algorithm? SL and TP are designed for this purpose - to close a position (to make a trade reverse to the opening one).
so your stopophobia is not justified.
The very essence of SL.
To prevent large losses and close the trade in time to avoid large losses or deposit in case of incorrect forecast of the TSR behaviour.
If the algorithm of position closing is OPTIMAL, there is no need in SL.....
Or are you against this thesis?....
if you close a position by algorithm, why can't SL and TP be set by algorithm? SL and TP are designed for this purpose - to close a position (to make a trade reverse to the opening).
so your stopophobia is not justified.
You forgot that stop and take is just a number.....
If you can guess the number, you should work at SPORTLOTO!
You forget that stop and take is just a number.....
If you can guess the number, then you should work at SPORTLOTO!
once again I have to ask you a more precise question, do you ever make a reverse trade to close a position? if yes, then you are satisfied with the closing price, which is also a NUMBER!!!
so why can't there be an SL or a TP on that NUMBER?
really, some kind of stopophobia....
Once again I have to ask a more precise question, do you ever make a reverse trade to close a position? If yes, then you are satisfied with the closing price, and this is also a NUMBER!!!
so why can't there be an SL or TP on this NUMBER?
Again you misunderstand me....
Opening a position (as well as closing) happens according to the ALGORITHM, where VERY many parameters that must coincide for the SIGNAL to open ( or close ) a position....
I am not interested in what NUMBER there will be, as the Expert Advisor works there....
All speculators have the same strategy - to make a profit. But their tactics are absolutely different.
One should also remember that speculators are not the only ones on the markets.
It is not a shame to close a profitable deal even for oneself at any time.
But a losing one?
Psychology will resist to close a losing deal up to the disappearance of the last coins on the deposit.) I've been through it, I know.)))))
SL is mandatory. !!!!
TP according to the mood of sufficiency or if possible to be in the field of market observation.
If the position closing algorithm is OPTIMAL, there is no need for SL....
Or are you against such a thesis?...?
I am against it. I have already chewed it up above.
You've misunderstood me again....
Position opening (as well as closing) is done according to the ALGORITHM, where VERY many parameters that must coincide for the SIGNAL to open ( or close ) a position....
I am not interested in what NUMBER there will be, as the Expert Advisor works there....
Oh, that's it! I didn't realise what was wrong.
It turns out you don't know how to set SL and TP with an EA, you only know how to do it by hand. it's okay, read the documentation, it's not difficult.
Just as an EA can close a position on a signal, an EA can also close a position on stops, stop levels can be calculated in advance and can be adjusted according to the situation.
I'm against it. Already chewed it up above.
I will repeat again for the ALTERNATIVELY gifted....
Algorithm for closing a position is a SIGNAL when tracking the current market situation....
And stop is a number invented from the trader's head..., probably in a drug-induced delirium....
I'll say it again for the ALTERNATIVELY gifted....
The algorithm for closing a position is a SIGNAL when tracking the current market situation....
And stop is a number invented from the trader's head..., probably in a drug-induced delirium....
Is this some kind of trolling?
what does the trader's head have to do with it, if stops are managed by EA and set where it is profitable to exit according to the strategy? even on VPS there can be a loss of connection with the server, and stops stand on the server side, if stops are part of the calculated prices for exiting a position, why would EA not do it?
it's not even funny anymore.