The future of the Forex industry - page 75
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Great news! Russia is now the fairest country in the world! (according to transcendreamer)
Yes, the whole world is in the pocket ... A bunch of rich people who determine and dictate the world order.
Why is it that driving a car requires a licence, working as a lawyer or an accountant requires a degree, but creating a new life requires nothing - is that a lesser responsibility?
The right to reproduce is given by nature, irrespective of the individual's wishes. And this is right. Otherwise, there would be chaos and some countries, such as India, would reap the benefits of interfering with the ratio of girls to boys. They don't grab girls by the millions anymore.
These pseudo-scientists, instead of dealing with economics, find topics in which they themselves do not fully understand. For example, economists still don't know the profit formula and are unaware that economics is a purely mathematical problem and there is no room for demagogy. Nevertheless, economics has been turned into demagogy. They do not know the laws of price formation under market conditions, they are unaware of the existence of virtual prices, although they determine the profit of any entrepreneur. Most importantly, they do not dare to find out and investigate such problems.
They are busy with brain problems, unaware that it is completely impossible to get involved with their minimal knowledge in this matter.
Interesting, I'll read it. Clearly the idea must be a hundred years old, it's too on the surface. All the more it is strange that it has not been developed, evidently there are some unobvious drawbacks of such an approach. At first glance we can assume unpopularity because of the broad masses, who will be offended (albeit fairly) defeated in the voting rights due to low intelligence and morality. Where did the adjustment go?
Discrimination has to start with yourself. The electoral system is the worst model for the creation of statehood, Aristotle argued.
Yes, the whole world is in the pocket ... A bunch of rich people who define and dictate the world order.
The whole world is in the pockets of the trillion-dollar Norwegians.
The boomerang of doom will not be long in coming, but it will be too late! Such "research" must be banned by law. Those who instigate interference in the holy of holies of nature should be burned at the stake, as they should have done with the HIV-infected in their time. The days of mankind are numbered. No one is sounding the alarm properly. I think it's too late for that.
Ahahaha, yes we have a Spanish Inquisition here! 😅😆😃
Surprised at the backwardness and narrowness of thinking... Quite surprised... A kind of radically technophobic outlook.
The right to reproduce is given by nature, irrespective of the individual's wishes. And rightly so. Otherwise, there would be chaos and some countries, like India, would reap the benefits of interfering with the ratio of girls to boys. They don't grab girls by the millions anymore.
This right does not seem so indisputable to me. For example, does a person who has a high (or 100%) probability of passing on a severe hereditary disease to a child have the right to procreate? Or is this an irresponsible move and such a person should refrain from having children? If the person is extremely poor, then the children will be condemned to poverty and all its consequences: health problems, lack of normal upbringing and education. Is it good for children to be born and live in such conditions? And if a person leads an immoral life, for example, a drug addict or a jobless alcoholic? How would their children live? Are they going to be well fed, happy, dignified? Who will they grow up to be in such an environment?
They are busy with brain problems, not knowing that it is impossible to go there with their minimal knowledge.
Where will deep knowledge come from if you don't study the issue with the limited knowledge you have at the moment?
Discrimination has to start with yourself. The electoral system is the worst model of statehood, Aristotle argued.
And what is the best? Autocracy by the sun-faced leaders of the nation?
The whole world is in the pockets of the Norwegians, who have a trillion-dollar safety net.
Norway, like other European countries, are puppets in the hands of the world hegemon. They cannot do anything serious without looking to him.
What's the best one? Autocracy by the sun-faced leaders of the nation?
Aristotle's is monarchy.