The future of the Forex industry - page 72
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/368613/page59#comment_22329823
After this post I would delete everything and ban the author of this quote.
Otherwise ineffective, suffering is necessary ... - Who will determine who is ineffective and who has to suffer? There was one such person in history who built gas chambers and ovens. Ugh!
You'd think it was the author's idea. - The author only reveals the essence of phenomena without rose-tinted glasses...
Apparently, a rhetorical Stalingrad and total defeat for the German rhetorical school is beginning to loom)
Hooray, comrades!
And who here represents the Soviet school of rhetoric, and where is it even here? And where do such predictions about Stalingrad even come from?
Objectively, we don't see capitalism somehow disappearing...
On the contrary it is rather strengthening, intercepting and assimilating socialist tendencies within itself.
Corporations are beginning to move to SRI/GRC/etc practices to eliminate socialist threats in advance, eliminating dissatisfaction with shareholder capitalism.
But this does not mean that the Friedman model suddenly disappears, the dividend continues to go to shareholders.
SRI/GRC and other practices of stakeholder capitalism are only a compensatory superstructure over the economic base.
"Suffering" is necessary because it is the driving force behind evolution.
What do you mean by "suffering" ?
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/368613/page59#comment_22329823
After this post would have deleted everything and banned the author of this quote.
In fact it's obvious that this post here too is refined suffering, and it's amazing, I'm in awe of this fractality!
It turns out you can create suffering just by reminding yourself of suffering!
Or ineffective, suffering is necessary ... - and who will determine who is ineffective and who has to suffer!? There was one such person in history, he built gas chambers and ovens. Ugh!
Who? - The market determines (and society through the market) and it is obvious, it is a universal universal mechanism.
Whoever is less successful suffers - both in primitive society and in cyberpunk - it is invariant.
There is nothing to be offended or angry about, it's just the way the world works.
And the comparison with Hitla is incorrect because we are not discussing direct violence here.
Question above.
What do you mean by "suffering" ?
There must be something missing. Food or money to fill up a Dilbar or Eclipse 😊
There has to be something missing. Food or money to fill up Dilbar or Eclipse 😊
Or money for a child's treatment? When they collect millions on TV, should they also let them suffer?
"Suffering" is necessary as it drives evolution. The 80% should want to move into the 20%. No argument here. And the "hyperbola" of wealth distribution cannot be "straightened" anyway. It can only be "trimmed" slightly along the edges (maximum and minimum). And the entire upward movement of the state should be pulled up. Like in the States, $4-5k/month - the poverty threshold and essentially a guaranteed level of income.
And then there's the competitive environment for selecting the best, and the turbulence.
For example, deep at the bottom of the ocean, evolution stopped long ago, nothing changes there, everything is too stable.
Stability is fading, we need shake-ups, it strengthens and improves the system in the end.
If the mechanism of selection of the best is blocked or strongly restricted, it will also be fading - as ineffective ones will fill up the space.
The same thing happened in the economy under socialism, when enterprises were deeply uncompetitive in terms of products, but they were still financed.
Any restriction of the market will have consequences.
Some market corrections are useful and some kill the economy.