Signal ranking! - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Read, so the subscriber has paid for a year's subscription, the provider only gets the money after 365+7 days! Hilarious...
So subscription for one month maximum, maximum 37 days comes out, if there is more than one subscriber then there is a payout conveyor and no problem.
One more thing about signals: what could be the reason for this
I've had this happen, a person wanted to buy a product, but then mistakenly paid for a signal instead of buying a product, maybe it's the same for you, the dates are similar.
Petros, we are talking about a signals service. There are no "for yourself" signals. There are signals "for subscribers".
And if so, you have to look at it from the subscriber's point of view.
It is important for me, as a subscriber, to be able to answer the question "What is the drawdown?" with the answer "The maximum drawdown of 95% in three years of trading".
And you're suggesting that I should be told "10% drawdown" and should not mention that this 10% drawdown is only for the last two months when you supposedly started trading "differently".
And when I subscribe to your signal and lose my deposit, you will tell me: "You should have looked carefully".
This approach of yours, Petros, is called "cunning". It breaks where it's thin.
If the drawdown was 95%, then it will happen again. And everybody, who really trades, knows it. There is no need to fool anyone.
What has slyness got to do with it? It is right what Petros says, if you have a long signal, it is not sure that you will have another failure, why? A trader is developing all the time, he is growing, learning from his mistakes, and the situation 3 years ago is not the same as now. You think about it, take any worker, even an electrician, and after three years he will do the same job as three years ago? Nonsense! Of course he has grown as a professional in three years, if not as a professional, then as a specialist at the very least. That is life. And you are trying to prove that a trainee will still be a trainee after three years? :)
What you've painted is not life - it's just more idealistic blah-blah-blah about growing professionals, pro-traders, specialists and the like.
This is life:
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. - an American investment bank, formerly one of the world's leading financial conglomerates. Founded in 1850 in Montgomery, Alabama, by Jewish brothers from Rimpar, Bavaria: Henry, Emmanuel and Meyer Lehman. Headquartered in New York. The company went bankrupt in 2008.
Financial markets are speculation -- and speculation is not without scams, bubbles and imminent bankruptcies.
Everybody is guaranteed to go under, some sooner, some later.
Those who don't sell out either haven't traded or have stopped in time or accidentally.
What you've painted is not life - it's just more idealistic blah-blah-blah about growing professionals, pro-traders, specialists and the like.
This is life:
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. - an American investment bank, formerly one of the world's leading financial conglomerates. Founded in 1850 in Montgomery, Alabama, by Jewish brothers from Rimpar, Bavaria: Henry, Emmanuel and Meyer Lehman. Headquartered in New York. The company went bankrupt in 2008.
Financial markets are speculation -- and speculation is not without scams, bubbles and imminent bankruptcies.
Everybody is guaranteed to go under, some sooner, some later.
Those who don't sell out either haven't traded or have stopped in time or accidentally.
This is not true, it is just another statistic from the net, made up by the pseudo-traders.
This is not true, but another statistic from the net, made up by the trader wannabes.
Don't be ridiculous. What statistics from the net?
I myself am capable of generating theses, both true and false. When there is a quote, I provide a link. When there is no link, it's purely my text. And there's nothing to be ascribed to plagiarism.
Don't be absurd. What statistics from the net?
I myself am capable of generating theses, both true and false. When there is a quote, I provide a link. When there's no link, it's purely my text. And there's no need to plagiarize.
History knows many cases where professional electricians have been electrocuted.
From this we can conclude: "If you are an electrician, you are bound to get electrocuted, as your professionalism increases", there is only one way out - to retrain as a plumber
History has seen many cases where professional electricians have been electrocuted.
From this we can conclude: "If you are an electrician, you are bound to get electrocuted, as your professionalism increases", there is only one way out - to retrain as a plumber
When you can show us your personal trading, which experienced long-term trends, flats, high volatility - and at the same time the trading indicators, such as drawdown, profitability, were steadily improving - then we will have something to talk about.
Until there is no such a thing - my thesis: "Everybody is losing" - is correct and cannot be refuted.
And until you (or someone else) don't have a proof of it, we are not talking about anything.
What you've painted is not life - it's just more idealistic blah-blah-blah about growing professionals, pro-traders, specialists and the like.
This is life:
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. - an American investment bank, formerly one of the world's leading financial conglomerates. Founded in 1850 in Montgomery, Alabama, by Jewish brothers from Rimpar, Bavaria: Henry, Emmanuel and Meyer Lehman. Headquartered in New York. The company went bankrupt in 2008.
Financial markets are speculation -- and speculation is not without scams, bubbles and imminent bankruptcies.
Everybody is guaranteed to go under, some sooner, some later.
Those who don't sell out either haven't traded or have stopped in time or accidentally.
I can totally see these brothers starting a bank and then losing it 158 years later :) Cool! You know the whole history of the bank, something tells me that the managers were changing like gloves ... So that's not an example! I asked you a very clear and understandable question. Do you think that a person who works in some industry over the years stays at the same level and does not grow professionally? You are trying to yoke, and try to prove to me that a person will eventually die. Here is your thought.