Registration for the MetaQuotes-Demo Championships in May - page 50
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
A QUESTION TO ALL PARTICIPANTS!
How will you react if the winner of the second nomination will have equity = 10$ on Saturday morning and even if he has the largest balance, let us say = 140,000$
I'm sorry, Yuri, but I have to admit you're an idiot....
The second nomination takes into account the drawdown in the formula and a participant will not be at the top, but in *the*hole, where he belongs.
In addition, your knowledge of trading is clearly not enough to understand elementary things - this arrangement is simply impossible, because the participant will be taken out by margin call much earlier and he would have rolled down a long time ago before the end of the competition...
In the formula I looked, yes the drawdown is taken into account, I easily admit the mistake, in any case the formula implies a desirable closing of positions on Friday, to improve the second nomination readings.
In real life it is not always logical to close positions on Friday, it concerns profitable positions.
In the formula I looked, yes the drawdown is taken into account, I easily admit the mistake, in any case the formula implies a desirable closing of positions on Friday, to improve the second nomination readings.
In real life it is not always logical to close positions on Friday, it concerns profitable positions.
Ok, Yuri. Now that you have admitted your mistake (the slippage was flagrant), I will give you an example from another area, because the example with the pipe may be understandable to technologists, but not understandable to philologists and people with economic education, so that finally clear your mind.
Imagine that you have 10k in your pocket (balance). And a certain amount of money lying in the bank with a floating rate (equity), which can be both positive and negative. When the rate is positive, the bank owes you. When it is negative, you owe the bank. The earning strategy will be to withdraw money from the bank account as often as possible when the rate is positive and close the account completely when the rate goes down. Thus the open deposit time decreases and at the limit approaches a state where the account is always closed (the safest strategy is not to trade). It follows, therefore, that it is always advantageous to close a position as early as possible, so as not to have a collapse of the bank rate. In other words - you should try not to be indebted to anyone and not to have debtors. By the way, such clients are the preferred ones by credit institutions (why is that?).
And now, to reinforce the point, think about what you said above and apply it to what you said earlier about equity. Hopefully you will come away with an understanding.
OK, Yuri. Since you have admitted your mistake (and the slippage was a glaring blunder), I will give an example from another field, since the example with the pipe may be understandable to technologists, but not understandable to philologists and people with an economic education, in order to finally clear your mind.
Imagine that you have 10k in your pocket (balance). And a certain amount of money lying in the bank with a floating rate (equity), which can be both positive and negative. When the rate is positive, the bank owes you. When it is negative, you owe the bank. The earning strategy will be to withdraw money from the bank account as often as possible when the rate is positive and close the account completely when the rate goes down. In this way the open deposit time decreases and in the limit approaches a state where the account is always closed (the most reliable strategy is not to trade). It follows, therefore, that it is always advantageous to close a position as early as possible, so as not to have a collapse of the bank rate. In other words - you should try not to be indebted to anyone and not to have debtors. By the way, such clients are the preferred ones by credit institutions (why is that?).
Now, to reinforce the point, think about the above and apply it to what you said earlier about equity. I hope you will come out with an understanding.
Andrey Dik- completely, from and to, supervises the second nomination.
Yuriy Zaytsev- fully and completely supervises the first nomination.
Truth is born in an argument .......... (in one case only, without getting personal)
Andrey Dik- completely, from and to, supervises the second nomination.
Yuriy Zaytsev- fully and completely supervises the first nomination.
Truth is born in an argument ..........
Well, that's good.
And I, unlike you, easily admit mistakes and various faults, correct them and drive on and do not dwell on them. And by the way, I try not to be rude as much as possible, again, unlike you.
Yes, I also easily admit my mistakes if the opponent is convincing enough. But so far we have what we have, and that's the end of it).
When I was at school I used to piss off the chemist (God rest her soul), because I had to solve problems in 3 steps (and got the right answer), instead of 4 steps as she had taught me. As a result, the whole class did the same, in 3 steps. It was because she was not convincing enough.
Yes, I, too, easily admit mistakes if the opponent is convincing enough. But for now, we have what we have and that's the end of it.)
Back at school I used to piss off the chemist (may God rest her soul) by solving problems in 3 steps (and getting the right answer), not 4 as she taught me. As a result, the whole class did the same, in 3 steps. All because she wasn't convincing enough.
Well, then go back to the topic with write-sharing access to one file from different terminals - and publicly admit your very grave technical error. But to admit it, you must have a real practical experience of IT specialist, who understands how highly loaded systems are arranged. Maybe then words and actions will not divide. It is one thing to solve chemistry problems and another to understand how IT systems work, these are very different areas.
Well, then go back to the topic with shared write access to the same file from different terminals - and publicly admit your very gross technical error. But to admit it, you must have a real practical experience of an IT specialist who understands how highly loaded systems are built. Maybe then words will not differ from deeds.
There is no error there, I've already told you, I successfully use a shared folder for several terminals.
The main thing is practice, those 3 actions in tasks, not ranting. You still haven't tried to access the folder from the link following my advice, unfortunately.
Also, I offered you a software way to control access to a shared file for $10,000, but you refused.
There's no mistake there, I've said it before, I successfully use a shared folder for several terminals.
The main thing is practice, the 3 actions in the tasks, not ranting. You still haven't tried accessing the folder from the link following my advice, unfortunately.
Moreover, I offered you a software way to control access to a shared file for $10,000 but you refused.