Registration for the MetaQuotes-Demo Championships in May - page 51
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No more questions, that's the end of it, I see you don't even understand your mistake, you're probably better at chemistry.
That's what the chemist said too, "Andrei, you don't understand your mistake! But what mistake can there be when the answer is right? Time after time, every time it's right. And to conduct the experiment that I have suggested a thousand times - your pride does not allow.
Pride is a sin.
Well, the chemist said the same thing "Andrei, you don't understand your mistake!". But what mistake can there be when the answer is right? Time after time, every time is right. And to conduct the experiment that I have suggested a thousand times - your pride does not allow.
Pride is a sin.
I just understand what will happen - when a dozen or more terminals will write their data streams - in one file without a manager considering the integrity of the data, but you do not - do not understand.
In practice, the recording will go and somehow work - until the verification of data integrity. If you lack knowledge in this essentially clear and simple issue for IT specialist, well, read once again thoughtfully at least what Renat says on this subject.
But it seems that what others say, including highly qualified professionals, is not enough for you to understand.
You are talking about the shared folder C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\MetaQuotes\Tester\.
The same principle is needed for the terminal in normal mode, not with forced reference to a shared folder to the history bases. Now it works well, but please implement this feature normally by specifying a folder to history databases from the terminal settings.
It doesn't work well and can't work. You' re just lucky and the bases aren't killed by overwriting much. We have a total recheck of all bases with transparent recovery of all errors based on data from server, which eliminates potential collisions (if writing from different terminals in one directory) and damage.
You have to be very risk-averse to work in such an environment. All the more so because it's terrible to demand and claim everything is right and normal.We once fell out when the admins of one broker came to us complaining about file recording errors.
It turned out that they had been backing up servers with all the files on the fly for a long time. Not shadow copy, but they were copying files in the peasant way. To the question "what were you guys thinking???" the answer was "why, everything worked fine for a long time!".
That's how @Andrey Dik answers. At the same time he suggests to enable it for millions of traders. So that a couple hundred step on the rake every hour.
The explanation was given:
The current architecture is very good, fast and secure. We did not write the fifth generation of trading platforms for nothing - we know the cost of each solution.
If you don't understand it - well, write and develop your systems in the same style - please, only for yourself.
B let it all work correctly in your personal "world". God forbid - if your developments affect people's safety or their finances.
I just understand what will happen - when a dozen or more terminals will write their data streams - in one file without a manager considering the integrity of the data, but you do not - do not understand.
In practice, the recording will go and somehow work - until the verification of data integrity. If you lack knowledge in this essentially clear and simple issue for IT specialist, well, read once again thoughtfully at least what Renat says on this subject.
But it seems that what others say, including highly qualified professionals, is not enough for you to understand.
If it is not clear to you, write and design your systems in the same style, but please do it for yourself.
B let it all work correctly in your personal "world". And God forbid - if your developments affect the safety of people or their finances.
I offered you a software access control to the file as a proof that it can be done, but you refused. Why'd you say no?
OK, it's endless - I'm sick of it already.
I did offer you software file access control as proof that it is possible, but you refused. Why did you refuse?
OK, it's endless - I'm sick of it already.
You read what you're told! - it works until the first data integrity fuck-up, do you understand that? I see that you don't. i. e. you don't know how to easily admit a mistake .
"It doesn't work well and it can't work."
"You have to be very risk-averse to work in such an environment. All the more creepy to demand and claim that everything is right and normal."
You - read what you're being told! - It works until the first data integrity fuck-up, do you understand that? I see you don't.
Are you being rude again? Once again, we had an argument in which I offered proof but you refused to accept it !!! You're the one who doesn't read shit, you're the fucking IT guy...
You're getting off on insults again, rudeness, boorishness and personalities - when there are no arguments. If you don't want to admit it, don't admit it. Stay in your "world" in which "your crooked mechanism" works.
And this thread is not to clarify your IT illiteracy that is so obvious that there is nothing to add. I do not want to be snide.
IT experts - write to YOU, by the way, if you noticed it, correcting your errors, while quite culturally!You're getting off on insults again, rudeness, boorishness and personalities - when there are no arguments. If you don't want to admit it, don't admit it. Stay in your "world" in which "your crooked mechanism" works.
And this thread is not to clarify your IT illiteracy that is so obvious that there is nothing to add. I don't want to be snide with you.
Just look at this guy.... Talking like a grouse and not noticing anything.... I offered proof, which you refused to accept. Therefore you have no right to say my mechanism is "crooked". Stop trolling, we already understand each other.
You'd better take care of your literacy, you came to the competition but have no idea of marginal ... It's a laugh and a sin as they say.
Just look at this guy.... Talking like a grouse and not noticing anything around him.... I offered evidence, which you refused to accept. Therefore you have no right to say my mechanism is "crooked". Stop trolling, we already understand each other.
"All the more creepy to demand and claim that everything is right and normal."
Did you miss it ?
"All the more creepy to demand and claim that everything is right and normal."
Did you miss it ?
Need I remind you again about the 10K dispute you slyly refused?
Enough already, Yura!!!
Need I remind you again of the 10K argument you slyly refused to make?
Enough already, Yura!!!
Please do not make fun of IT professionals who understand what data integrity is. You are again using not very nice epithets . I do not respect myself to argue with you after I know that you are literate in IT. Forgive me, of course, I have already written that in an argument one fool and another scoundrel. Forgive me again, I cannot be a scoundrel. But I will be glad to know that your family will be left with 10,000 rubles. I already regret very much that I suggested you admit your mistake, which has been pointed out to you by several people in the technical thread. You don't know how to admit them. And you do not understand the arguments, because you need to understand the issue. And let's cut the crap already - everything else is on topic.
Better take part in the PRIZE FUND! 100$ at least.
You can transfer it to https://www.mql5.com/ru/users/server, the organizer.