What's new in MetaTrader 4 and MQL4 - big changes on the way - page 29
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The point is that a thousand and a half servers (not just one for the sake of marketing) will have to provide extremely accurate, non-contradictory bar history in great depth. And that in the current environment is practically impossible. And it is not up to us.Ticking history on the bars in the stock markets is an even greater challenge. Not only that, this sphere is completely paid for, it is paid for by specialized companies and has a lot of legal restrictions on distribution. Everybody understands about desires, logic, but there are a lot of technical and legal restrictions. Until a free information base is ready, it makes no sense for us to go out and offer unworkable solutions.
Here's the news)))) You can see the feed history on the CME website, not to mention that by opening a real account, the trader automatically or on request(depth) gets access to the history.
All these improvements will be bullshit as long as there are opportunities on the server side to fool "speculators":)
This is the news)))) You can see the feed history on the SME website, not to mention that by opening a real account, the trader automatically or on request(depth) gets access to the history.
All these improvements will be bullshit as long as there are opportunities on the server side to fool "speculators" :)
// I'm not against quote correction. I am against "correction". There are cases when a correction is necessary (server failure, for example, or loading a deeper history).
// But this is force majeure, which can be openly announced on the broker's off-site, and described in detail in the news (what exactly and for what purpose was corrected).
// A background uncontrolled "correction" opens the door to very large machinations. (For example a complete inoperability of the seemingly tested strategies. Since they were tested on a "setup").
I agree to any form of server "fooling" (like cunning filtering, or individual quoting. I can fool them all in my favour) except trivial quote manipulation. Like broadcasting one thing, but writing another in the story. And then we rewrite the history again (under the carefree name of "correction"). Therefore, responsible broadcasting and writing the tick history "from the producer" at least one day in depth should be implemented. And (of course!) fully coinciding with the minute, etc. history. Only this step is able to clear the market of impudent shamsters on the side of the brokers. Let them market-maker as much as they want, but let them be responsible for the quotes provided. By the way, there are many brokers who would support me in this opinion. Those who bet on an honest business.
// I'm not against a price correction. I am against "correction". There are times when a correction is necessary (server failure, for example, or loading a deeper story).
// But this is force majeure, which can be openly announced on the broker's off-site, and described in detail in the news (what exactly and for what purpose was corrected).
// A background uncontrolled "correction" opens the door to very large machinations. (For example a complete inoperability of the seemingly tested strategies. Since they were tested on a "setup").
It would be good to provide an option to enlarge the Expert Advisor-script properties window by user.
And it would be good to remove the displaying of the midpoint on the trend line in mt4 when dragging it. Since there is no technical possibility to add such a display in mt5.
I read the 28 page battle. Yeah, it's been a while since I've been here. I'm still here. I remember back in 2008-9, people were earning bans just for the subject of ticks. Oh, the times I'll tell you, they were a sight to behold. Such epics, where Kulikovskaya and other Prokhorovka.
I'm thinking of starting a new theme to get creative. What's with all the tics and tics and old stuff?
And give the history of the market !!! Oh, yes, with real volumes, why?! Yes, with logs of orders tickers in these markets, let's have a walk, yes, with signatures who placed these orders, so that everyone could see them, no need to show orders there by any Goldmans with Saks incogneto :)
And of course with 10 years of history, not necessarily, but it's a good idea to ask someone. And most importantly, it's free and even on demo.
[Scoffs]
Only this step has the potential to cleanse the market of brazen shams on the side of brokers.
Do you believe that cats will voluntarily give up their sour cream?
It would be a good idea to allow the user to enlarge the Expert-Script properties window.
Many people have already asked for this.
I would like to get a response from the developers.
So what?
The Communist Party and the CPSU Central Committee also regularly posted their grandiose plans in the Pravda newspaper. And the moderators (editors) of Pravda were referred to in a reverent whisper by other journalists as "truth-tellers". What's the use? The system itself, the approach to building the social system was flawed - SOCIALIST.
In order to turn a terminal for training traders into a terminal for TRADERS - the Metakvots need to get rid of socialism in their heads. In all its metaquota manifestations. Which ones? Well pay me for a consultation and I'll tell you. That would be the contractual relationship. At least start with the small stuff. Pay Reshetov what is due to him. The author must not be offended - it's been known for a long time. He was staring into the water - "Do you want to feed the lawyers?" And now I wonder how much Metakvot spent on legal advice during the Cyprus crisis to reformat the holding companies, to transfer money, to insure? Surely more than 50 reshet's dollars.
Trading is CONTRACTING, it is the pinnacle of financial business. And financial business is the pinnacle of business in general. And anyone who shoves socialist orders and socialist relationships in there will pay dearly.
What Metaquotes is doing now, these changes are just an echo of what I wrote to them on the MQL5 forum half a year ago. It's finally getting to them. But it's taking them too long and too slowly. Apparently, their arrogance and excess of cash gets in the way.
All this talk about frills on the screen is worthless. It's all secondary. Contractual relationships, trading, resource management, and all that goes with it are primary. And the Metakvot business model is EXACTLY contractual with brokers. And that puts a strain on all their activities. But that's OK, it's not such a big problem. It can be corrected in different ways. The main thing is that Renat and Sudarikov want it. On western forums they openly write that only the way of thinking of the two Metakvot founders is the main brake on the MT4-MT5 trading "platform".
Renat and Sudarikov! Ow!
Over.
Do you believe that cats will voluntarily refuse sour cream?
Which ones? Well, pay me for a consultation and I'll tell you.