Demonstration trading from Dr.F. - page 10

 
Mislaid:

What's the big deal. The guy sees something. But he hasn't decided on directions yet. He's catching his feet boldly, so don't get me started on the overlap.

From my vantage point, he's gone upwind three times this week. Two times successful, one not so much. What can you do, romantic!

It's not a hit-and-run, it's called public scepticism.

When this guy's had a hundred or two trips, then we'll have something to say about whether he sees or farts in a puddle.

Signals are full of grails sticking out in the tops with multiple trades. However, most of these very grails are easily moved from the tops to the ...opa when the quantity of trades turns into quality.

 
LeoV:

What about the score? Is the score a legitimate plus or an occasional minus?
Whose score?
 
LeoV:

You must realise that this ingenious non-delaying and non-drawing filter of yours shows a non-delaying and non-drawing of the past, but it does not show a non-delaying and non-drawing of the future.


You must understand that at the tip of the lagless filter, if it is really not lagging, is the REAL. But with less volatility than the original, unfiltered, chart. Hence, it is not immediately possible to predict the future.
 
Meat:
That's just one way, the simplest way. You don't equate anything at all, judging by your posts (you take 1 lot EURUSD vs 1 lot GBPUSD and try to compare their dynamics with EURGBP), what else is there to talk about...

Colleague, stop being stupid. You are just shown that the FORM of the curves is different. Take your mind off the absolute values. Is it not obvious to you that the FORMS do not depend on which constant multiplier you multiply (set the lot size) at the time of opening a trade? As different as the curve shapes were, they will be (the dependence of the pound on the dollar in the second curve is accounted for). The correlation coefficient of these two curves (result of a trade on two pairs EURUSD and GBPUSD on the one hand and result of EURGBP cross on the other hand) will also not change due to the fact that you multiply the first curve by k1 and the second one by k2. School.
 
Dr.F.:
You have to realise that at the tip of the non lagging filter, if it really isn't lagging, it's REALLY lagging. But with less volatility than the original, unfiltered, graph. Hence, it is not immediately possible to predict the future.

Talking about a certain tip on which you can allegedly make predictions about the future, because this tip does not dangle as much as the real one, is all illusions, inspired by youth and inexperience and by the way, confirmed by your 5 elks.

That's when the tip turns into a real tip, which will not dangle, but will stand firmly and reliably in the right direction of movement, only then you will be able to fuck not only forex, but even more pleasant forms of life... ))))

 
Dr.F.:
You have to realise that at the tip of a non lagging filter, if it really isn't lagging, it's REALLY lagging. But with less volatility than the original, unfiltered, graph. Hence, it is not immediately possible to predict the future.

Talking about a certain tip on which you can supposedly make predictions about the future, because this tip does not dangle as much as the real one, is all illusion, inspired by youth and inexperience and by the way, confirmed by your 5 elks.

That is when this not so much your dangling tip turns into a real and solid end, which will not dangle, but will stand firmly and reliably in the right direction of movement, only then you will be able to fuck not only forex, but even more pleasant forms of life... ))))

 
LeoV:

Talking about a certain tip on which you can supposedly make predictions about the future, since that tip doesn't dangle as much as the real is all illusions, inspired by youth and inexperience and confirmed by your 5 elks by the way.

Old lady, neither 5 nor 10 elks can confirm anything. For the system is statistical. A prediction based on a lag-free filter is possible and self-evident. It is even strange and silly to discuss. We are discussing the possibility of creating such a filter, that is the question.
 
Dr.F.: A prediction based on a lag-free filter is possible and self-evident. It is even strange and silly to discuss.
)))) nuh-uh ..... you are not the first and probably not the last.....))))
 
LeoV:

... and confirmed by your 5 elks, by the way.


When the market opens, there will be 3 profits:

So what? Both are nothing. It's the stats that count, not a few trades.

 
LeoV:
)))) nuh-uh ..... you are not the first, and apparently not the last.....))))


Take a normal SMA, shift to its lag left, and see if you can't imagine.