Negro! - page 75
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Talk about Sh ) and !
Yes, it's idiotic.
Of course, having full access to the transaction details of all DC clients (leaking clients in general), an anti-copier can be applied.
), as most traders do?
Do they (we) really guess the future direction of the price and go against the market? ;)
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Once again . With a random ts.
1 Imagine that the lot is always and all constant, no choice, only 1 lot
2 Imagine you have an endless deposit
3 Imagine there is no spread.
How long would you trade?
will you have long losing streaks ? yes
will there be long stretches with steady run-up ? there will be
But in the endless game, you will go back to the initial depo?
The Yusufs are picking out areas with a steady flush in history.
You're trying to pick plots with a flush and find a system in them, but it's not there by chance.
Then why are they flushing?
Because they break the rule of infinite depo and being in drawdown for infinite, they get a stop-out for their finite one, and the spread is pulling down in the long game.
You are trying to get the rule for a simple drawdown, but it will not do you any good, just increase the deposit or decrease the lot and it is not a drawdown, but a drawdown from which you will get out before you hit the spread.
You want to increase the rate of withdrawal - respectively, open the entire depo in any direction
Of course, having full access to the transaction data of all the DC clients (in general, the leaking ones), an anti-copier can be applied.
Most of the people on this forum believe in some kind of Sh
But they are deluded because there is no such thing as "S".
Let's take a set consisting of "S" and "S". So where there is "X" there is no "X" and vice versa.
If we exclude "S" from this set, we get "S" in its pure form.
(Come on, let the people be tormented! )
In other words, you described a place where there isn't an S.
But if you showed where there is no "X", then where there is no "X", there is "X", but if there is "X", then there is also "X".
So you're showing that !S exists.
Challenge it! )
As if that knowledge will make a difference )))
It will at least allow you to talk about the subject without creating a sense of delirium in the minds of others.
Most of the people on this forum believe in some kind of Sh
But they are deluded because there is no such thing as "S".
Let's take a set consisting of "S" and "S". So where there is "X" there is no "X" and vice versa.
If we exclude "S" from this set we get "S" in its pure form.
Where is it? From which set? Spring...