![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You're overreacting.
Well, never mind, now let everyone who wishes to be happy and get hope by contemplating your beautiful pictures, which do not show serious drawbacks. I'm not even going to stand in the way of that.
Mischek2: Why did he leave?
Not gone, but gone. Catch the private message.
Anyone who writes "shoulder" gets banned for life!
And for those who have an ava with a beard, level eight protection from being banned
I would have ordered a "mass destruction ban" and thrown a couple of charges at the villagers)
What's wrong with them? They're good guys.
Not with errors, but I would delete messages of the type "me and the guys here have been tagged by our ardir, and they've closed as they should".
Not gone, gone. Catch the private message.
Wow, are you guys having local tensions there?
grating
Dima, where have you seen his "trading" works? Don't refer to Shiryaev.
I meant that some experts in mathematics (and not only them, but you, Alexey, personally, I do not mean) very often refer to the works of great mathematicians. And when you look at the stats of these experts you understand that something is wrong.
Today there are no textbooks on stock mathematics. There are none at all. And as a consequence - the hole in which many find themselves.
When you offer these experts to show the real application of some formulas in practice, they for some reason run into the bushes.
As for the removal of incomplete stats, I think this is the right decision. Moreover, I would, if I were a moderator, tighten it up even more:
- The stats must be complete;
- would prohibit to post stats with less than 50 trades;
- would prohibit to post stats for period less than 1 year (and maybe even more);
This would be a blow to all sorts of cheaters and a cold shower for those who are engaged in self-deception. Therefore, I consider Alexei's actions to be correct.
As for freedom of speech in general, it should not be confused with freedom of boorishness and freedom of cheating. These are different things.
But on the other hand, I want to quote a famous person:
Went to bed. Woke up, turned on my smartphone, and here I was getting mud all over me again.
Nah, that's the way to do it: "... I went to bed. I feel like I'm being pelted with mud again. Woke up, turned on my smartphone, you won't believe..."
When you offer these experts to show the real application of these or those formulas in practice, they for some reason run to the bushes.
Yeah, or give some definition :) a very familiar situation. It reminds me a lot of someone.
I, for example, am knocked out when a person is pouring forth on all the branches, using the terminology that he alone understands and asserting dubious unsubstantiated things.