The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 30

 
paukas:
It means that the method used is not suitable.

The brevity of your statement does not allow me to get into the meaning.

If you could elaborate.

Above in the topic I have shown an analysis of the increments, from which:

approximately the same number of positive and negative increments;

Approximately the same number of consecutive positive and consecutive negative increments.

What does the model have to do with it?

Where is the profit?

 
Nafany: and don't bother... with econometrics.

There are millions of us.

Educated louts reacting to the posts. Written by MESA. Chewed and rewritten. Lots of indicators in MQL4. Study the math at least in the area of sinusoids.

 
faa1947:

The brevity of your statement does not allow me to get into the meaning.

If you could elaborate.

Above in the topic I have shown an analysis of the increments, from which:

approximately the same number of positive and negative increments;

Approximately the same number of consecutive positive and consecutive negative increments.

What does the model have to do with it?

Where is the profit?

What are the increments - hourly, weekly, monthly, minute? What instrument?

The distribution is different from the normal one. On small intervals the market rolls back, on longer intervals it is vice versa.

That's where the profit is.

 
paukas:

What are the increments - hourly, weekly, monthly, minute increments? What instrument?

The distribution is different from normal. On small intervals the market rolls back, on longer intervals it is the other way round.

Here is the analysis. EURUSD H1. I can quickly do a different timeframe and symbol.
 
faa1947:
Here is the analysis. EURUSD H1. I can quickly do a different timeframe and symbol.
You have taken very little data. It should be 5 years. And exclude the night.
 
You are missing one single step: making a decision on the current analysis. It may be a wrong decision at first, but it has to be there - it will normalise afterwards.
 
paukas:
You have taken very little data. You need five years. And exclude the night.
Five years on the H1?
 
faa1947:
On the H1 for five years?
Sure. At least three.
 
faa1947:

There are millions of us.

So you think the market is inefficient? Is that what you want, what you think, or do you feel it in your gut? What's your confidence based on? Just don't appeal to a local sample, it may be random. And unfortunately we do not have a general sample.

 
Nafany:

So you think the market is inefficient?

If it is efficient, what are you doing here?