You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Bez vei, so no masa...
Can I have one last wish: a semantic analysis of the expression:"... relax on the idiots..." ?
(concentrating) Ask a specific question.
Bullshit. Ah - the answer!
I've already asked.
Analyse the semantics of the expression, if you please:"... to relax on idiots...".
I'm talking to you as a linguist
Forget it... As a linguist, I don't give a shit. I don't give a shit.
Thank you. (chuckles)
Thank you!
There is an intrigue surrounding the presidential election
Mischek: Голосовалка текущий результат для мну не ожиданный слегка даже
Yes, it was the "party of the Internet" that voted, not the "party of television" (see link above).
Nothing unexpected, except - exact values :)
imho, there are three personalities and five clowns on the list.
You have not been to Libya but you know the situation. And the question for me "why they bombed" is rhetorical. So I should have shared my thoughts. I did. Turns out I didn't answer the question. That's funny.
You haven't lived in the West, but their values you don't know about you don't like. Funny.
Everything is based on ---INFORMATION ( with some degree of credibility, the closer to the source the more credible, the more of it the more credible)-------- ANALYSIS ( taking into account the configuration of your own computer in your head) ------- CONCLUSION
On the basis of the lack of information, the conclusion will be crooked. You understand that, but for some reason it does not stop you from being confident in your conclusions about Libya (unlike me, I immediately reported that I was not there and share assumptions)
and also about Western values.
Here's an interesting thing to note: there's talk of credibility.
What is it?