Twenty-four, and not one iota more! - page 23

 
Roman.:


That's funny :-)))

Screenshots, please...

You're welcome.

 
paukas:
Clearly, you don't understand what betting is.

So what? Do I have to run through the dictionaries to find out what betting is? I don't really understand what arbitrage is, and what option levels are, and I don't recognize the reinvestment rate, and I can't repair a BelAZ - so what?
 
Cod:

Honestly, I don't get it. I can tell you 90% of the time whether the market is going up or down. Anyway, three days from now...

I see, there you go again, donuts in your dreams.

Betting is when what it does over your three days doesn't matter. It's where it's going to be at the end.

You get a hundred quid, you don't get a hundred bucks, you lose a hundred. And no stops. That's typical of you. The only thing you lose is your commission.

Then there's the option, which is almost the same shit, but it's more complicated to calculate.

 
paukas:
I see, doughnuts in dreams again.
No, paukas, not doughnuts. It's very simple, in fact - put 23 pivots on the chart, and make sure the trend will be in the direction of the difference between today and yesterday's pivot. The problem is when the trend changes - here the pivot is severely delayed, offsetting the profit completely... Which is the agony I am sharing with you here - what to do, how to filter?
 
paukas:

I see, there you go again, donuts in your dreams.

Betting is when what it does over your three days doesn't matter. It's where it's going to be at the end.

You guessed it, you made a hundred quid, you didn't guess it, you lost a hundred. And no stops. That's typical of you. You only lose commissions.

There is also an option, which is almost the same shit, but more complicated in the calculation.


Reminds me of Corsa Capital, /http://corsacapital.org/ "options", yeah... Been there... A more ugly way to lose money I've never experienced. And don't be persuaded.
 
Cod:
No, paukas, not doughnuts. It's very simple, really - put 23 pivots on the chart, and make sure the trend is in the direction of the difference between today and yesterday's pivot. The problem is when the trend changes - here the pivot is severely delayed, offsetting the profit completely... Which is the agony I am sharing with you here - what to do, how to filter?

Why do I need pivots? You may set one average and know what the trend is. Or you may not place it and look at it with the naked eye from a close distance. But the robot cannot do it that way, so I have to put the average anyway.

 
paukas:

What do I need pivots for? You can put in one average and already know what the trend is. Or you don't need to, but you can look at it with the naked eye at close range.



But the trend changes! The average doesn't mean anything at all, it wanders behind the price, what can you tell from it, by definition?
 
Cod:

So the trend is changing! The average doesn't mean anything at all, it just follows the price, what can you tell from it, by definition?

Let me explain. Price above the average - trade up, below - down.

The trend continues more often than it changes. That's enough to make a little money...

 
Cod:

And such a reversal day will eat up all the profits you've been nursing for days...
Well that means that the expectation of your TS is less than 1 or even negative, despite 24 pivots. ))) The point of using such a TS - just to fill other people's wallets ))))). And someone will make a decent profit on such a reversal day, because he has another TS with high MO and other tricks)))
 
paukas:

Let me explain. Price above the average - trade up, below - down.

The trend continues more often than it changes. That's enough to make a little money...


Instead of arguing and sassing me and throwing trivialities and platitudes, you should come and put my stops and takeaways... And I'll be able to provide superbelievable entries - I can spot them after a litre of vodka just by opening my eyes...

(Laughs) Just kidding. :)
paukas, if I may, I'll come out with screenshots and real examples to explain why I'm running around with these "spikes", which you consider irrelevant.