What form, let's assume a physical body, does time have? Your opinion. - page 12
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
While we are on the subject of dimensionality.
If we refer to time as a dimension, then we can also refer to light as a dimension.
If a bundle of dollars is lying in a dark room and we can't see it, that doesn't mean it's not there.
That's the fifth dimension we don't give a damn about.
And time itself is measured in one plane and perceived as the examples of caterpillars and dogs were given, but it is time to move up a notch.
While we are on the subject of dimensionality.
If we refer to time as a dimension, then we can also refer to light as a dimension.
If a bundle of dollars is lying in a dark room and we can't see it, that doesn't mean it's not there.
That's the fifth dimension we don't give a damn about.
And time itself is measured in one plane and perceived as the examples of caterpillars and dogs were given, but it is time to move up a notch.
What form does time have, as a physical body, let's say?
If we measure time by some physical quantity, then maybe it must also have some form?
I would like to hear your opinion.
pendulum.
Time exists only in systems where there is cyclic interaction of bodies/elements of the system
Vladimir, let's elaborate .... Otherwise the "public" will again turn away from the path to some kind of Bifeld-Brown effect, figuratively speaking.
While we are on the subject of dimensionality.
If we refer to time as a dimension, then we can also refer to light as a dimension.
If a bundle of dollars is lying in a dark room and we can't see it, that doesn't mean it's not there.
That's the fifth dimension we don't give a damn about.
And time itself is measured in one plane and perceived as the examples of caterpillars and dogs were given, but it is time to move up a notch.
The plane - x is a primitive abstraction... It does not exist in nature...
A section of a three-dimensional object is a plane.
A three-dimensional object is an infinite set of planes.
If a plane is an abstraction, then a three-dimensional object consisting of a set of "abstract" planes is itself an abstraction in one's imagination.
It remains to be seen: whose imagination is this? ....
Time is a dynamic change of objects relative to each other in the system of coordinates adopted by a particular civilization.
Axiom 1: Time does not have a constant form due to chaotic changes relative to each other of the constituents of the unit of measurement in the system of coordinates used by the civilization.
Thus, physical properties of investigated objects and their categories will directly influence the form of time.
Example 1. A human being living on the planet. A human being can be represented as a point moving from one segment to another. Extreme points are consequently death and birth. Movement is unidirectional. Some segments are crossing. In relation to people we have a space with a number of dimensions - one, if we want to introduce an additional variable, um... for example the sun, and display the change of motion of each segment relative to the sun, we would have to add another dimension, a second one. So if we add all the known data we get an N dimensional space tending towards infinity. This will be a form of time. To human understanding this form is not comprehensible.
I wanted to write about forex, how this model works. But I do not want to burden others.
The essence only in one - from the practical point of view, search of a form of time, has no applied value.
A section of a three-dimensional object is a plane.
A three-dimensional object is an infinite number of planes.
If a plane is an abstraction, then a three-dimensional object consisting of a set of "abstract" planes is itself an abstraction in one's imagination.
It remains to be seen: a figment of whose imagination are we? ....
Shape - what is it? The outline of an object in the coordinates of the adopted space. And from whose point of view?
Draw a square on a sheet of paper - it is a square, roll the sheet up into a tube - it is a tube. But for those who live "in this leaf" it is still a square. There is no unambiguous definition of shape, any 3-dimensional object, can only be considered a projection of the 4-dimensional and above.
And time really may not exist.
By the way, black holes are already more complex than just massive objects. Their properties are such that they are no longer objects of space because they fall out of its structure. Similarly, a hole in a sheet of paper cannot be considered an object of this sheet. And in general, - all these are theories. Only calculations of the motion of stars in the vicinity of such "holes" provide evidence. Well, according to the calculations, we are all floundering in the "dark matter", which is 90% of mass, but shows itself only on an astronomical scale. We are unable to study "heavy matter" under our noses, so what distant holes are we talking about.... Or maybe it's not matter, or holes, or mass, or gravity.... but the will of God.
Amen, comrades.