Avalanche - page 192
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
mig34 wrote (a) >>
avalanche to slowly but surely make a profit
What does "avalanche" have to do with it? Any open position within a few days can produce a profit or loss several times the size of the initial margin. But it is unclear, if everything is so cloudless, why have not you screwed your own wisdom to the real? Or you do not have enough guts to make a profit after 9 plums? I'm sorry, what reason would you have for those who read your lies and believe them - to lose money steadily? You'd better tell the truth about the kitchen where you and John come from and what you're broadcasting here. )))
You are bullshitting because you are greedy for money
Today you made a profit after a flat, read the avalanche (for an exit) dub
What's wrong with my version that I posted here? )
From your own report:
'
The order which actually 'played the chain' is number 15, which is SELL, while the order (SELL) that could have played it, number 11, was closed ahead of time.
In other chains the first orders turn out to be opposite to the winner, but . truth (algorithm) is more expensive.
If you have to 'fear uncontrollability', then takeprofit all orders and modify TP each time a new position is added.
рост депо лучше, чем у меня. у тебя одна нога, у меня другая, однакож ходить надо на обеих:)
Of course you are! I was by no means thinking of competing with you. On the contrary, I'm very glad that someone else is doing it. Maybe you can suggest something interesting. In turn, I can suggest (although it has already been written here, but in case you haven't noticed), that a virtual trailing stop works great.
Вот стейты с реала например каждую пятницу - были бы убедительней любых самых бредовых расчетов... Вот он стейт ребята - нате еште... На понедельник было 10000 - на пятницу закрылся в 20000 - вывел 10000..
Вот это аргумент, с которым не поспоришь...
Next week I will repeat this trick, unobtrusively removing the account number from the screenshot (explaining that I don't want to share such personal information with anyone). I could do this every week indefinitely. What will you do? Will you start praying for me?
So don't expect any stats - they are all easily forged and tell you nothing.
Я понимаю, что "девушка уговорила", но первый ордер (только первый ордер) с тейкпрофитом портит всю картину.Из Вашего же отчета:
'
Ордер, который собственно "сыграл цепочку" - номер 15, который SELL, а ордер (SELL), который мог бы подыграть номер 11 Вы закрыли раньше времени.
В других цепочках первые ордера оказываются в первые ордера оказываются противоположными к победителю, но ... истина (алгоритм) дороже.
Если уж "бояться неуправляемости советника", то тейкпрофить надо все ордера и модифицировать TP при добавлении каждой новой позиции.
This is correct. In the following versions, after the take has failed and doubling has started, the take profit is removed. And there is a version without it at all. I have made a lot of them). For all tastes. And if you want to see another unexpected one, I can make it too.
This is correct. In the following versions, after the take has failed and doubling has started, the take profit is removed. And there is a version without it at all. I have made a lot of them). For all tastes. And if you want to see another unexpected one, I can make it too.
Try screwing in what I suggested... A variable corridor, as suggested by SAM.
моя версия лавины, в тестере, не сливает, хоть ты тресни. :) Любой временной интервал с одним параметром.
And it won't. That's the idea. "Avalanche is the only break-even system.
Of course you are! I was by no means thinking of competing with you. On the contrary, I'm very glad that someone else is doing it. Maybe you can suggest something interesting. In turn, I can suggest (although it has already been written here, but in case you haven't noticed), that a virtual trailing stop works great.
space... How is it different from a simple one, apart from the fact that it is not seen by the DC (if I understand correctly)
And it won't. That's the idea. "Avalanche is the only break-even system.
and you with humor.
And if you want to see some more unexpected ones, I can do that too.
I've made a lot of "netting" and "locked" versions myself :)
Last dabble - lot increment and change of channel width depending on iteration number.
But I'm not interested in a graph of anything over a few hundred years from a few meters, but in a fragment of the graph in front of the maximum lot.
Here I wanted to derive a formula (most importantly, a nice one!!!) for the "equivalent takeprofit" for each iteration.
I.e. we have the second order with lot X to take a profit of Y, we should set TP, and SL for the first order; the third order has opened, etc. And we have any lots of each new order and any trigger level. So to say, to build a chart of "spread legs of the circular" (I don't remember all terms long ago).
But ... my idle time is over :(
'
SZY... There is also a version when a chain reaches the specified profit (still in "locked system" all is easier to count) all orders of unprofitable direction are closed, and the orders of "profitable direction are trailed", but ... multiplying virtual capitals is bullshit (about 7 variants are already standing on the demo). It is more interesting (was) to try to cheat ... "world behind the scenes" :) on unpleasant plots.
(I was better at training grids to predict volatility changes than anything else :) )