[Archive c 17.03.2008] Humour [Archive to 28.04.2012] - page 685

New comment
 
DhP:

Proved? How was it done? By postmortem mask? )))

In the analysis of the works:

a) Dull, lifeless, unimpressive, colourless, grey + +
b) Weak, unremarkable, insignificant, lacking in mental strength and moral stability, not strong-willed + +
c) Sad, mournfully concerned, grieving +
d) frail, sluggish, sickly +
e) Dark, doubtful, suspicious +
f) Scary, frightening +
g) Sad, joyless, unhappy, not cheerful +

:)

 
Integer:

Actually, he died when he was 30, in case you didn't know.

I'm talking about mood... what are you talking about?

That's why you can agree with the analysis of the piece.

It correlates with a lot of things.

 
avatara:

I'm talking about mood... what are you talking about?

That's why you can agree with the analysis of the piece.

It correlates with many things.


Yesenin was depressive, even in a mental hospital.
 
Integer:

Yesenin was depressive, he was even in a mental hospital.

"Withering in gold, I shall be no more young."

it's written at 26.

That's more accurate ...

 

Curious as to what kind of performance this generator will give our Leaders?

 
 
moskitman:
This is how horoscopes are written. A gypsy's set of worked-out stamps has a purposeful effect on its own. And if there is also a rudimentary vocabulary analysis plus the GCV, the result will be good.
 
granit77:
plus PRNG

Sorry, it's not RNG, it's PRNG.

 
PapaYozh:

Sorry, it's not RNG, it's PRNG.

As you can guess, we Tatars... (not programmers) either RPM or PRNG... :))
 
The correct reference to PRNG before rand() is randomize(time()).
So it's the PRNG after all ))
1...678679680681682683684685686687688689690691692...847
New comment