FOREX - Trends, forecasts and implications 2016 - page 604

 
new-rena:
Mighty, then why did you go into the sale? The old one bought the euro, and you know, I think he was right.
Does this https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/71038/page521#comment_2669896 look like a sale?

And clarification - https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/71038/page576#comment_2689291
FOREX - Тенденции, прогнозы и следствия 2016
FOREX - Тенденции, прогнозы и следствия 2016
  • reviews: 2
  • www.mql5.com
Скриншоты торговой платформы MetaTrader.
 
mmmoguschiy-new:
Does this https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/71038/page521#comment_2669896 look like a sale?

And clarification - https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/71038/page576#comment_2689291
Are these two links on indices or what? This is not the time to trade on history based indices. I think current volumes are the decisive word in price movement and OM, of course.
 
new-rena:
Are these two links on indices or what? This is not the time to trade on history-based indices. Volumes are the decisive word on price movements, I think.
When I got to this point, I started to think that the price would go higher than 1.109, then it would go higher. Read it and laugh - https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/71038/page565#comment_2687139
FOREX - Тенденции, прогнозы и следствия 2016
FOREX - Тенденции, прогнозы и следствия 2016
  • reviews: 3
  • www.mql5.com
Скриншоты торговой платформы MetaTrader.
 
mmmoguschiy-new:
The problem is that the price went up... This is a link to the forecast. At that time Stary was still shouting about 0.9 for the Euro and that it would not go higher than 1.108 - here was a collection of screenshots on this topic. Read it and laugh - https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/71038/page565#comment_2687139

It happens to everyone, I can tell you that. There's an error in the calculation by hand. If you drill the calculator, it won't calculate the same way. You need a program.

You need to recalculate the archive of reports, overlay the history of quotes, check the method of calculation and so on.

But no one wants to use hands to impose all of the available reports on the history to find the error - well, where and what was the error, for example, why was I expecting the downward trend, and the price went up?

 
new-rena:
Happens to everyone, I can tell you that. The error in manual calculations is obvious. If you drill the calculator, it won't calculate the same way. You need a program.

I have no mistakes, the price was at 1.1050-70 when I told them it would not go higher and they were buying like sheep with HIM in charge. Not only that, I also sold there and showed them the sale later, they were biting themselves on the y...a and swearing))))

Before that, I told them to sell above 1.14 and from 1.12, they also bought. When I told them to sell above 1.14 and 1.12 they also bought.

As for Spirit on red, he is a dumb-head, Romain, his friend, had been buying euro for 3 weeks with his online levels in ToC.

And 0.9 will be 0.9, no way.

We have nothing to calculate there automatically, so we do not need any programs.

 
sxww:

I have no mistakes, the price was at 1.1050-70 when I told them it would not go higher and they were buying like sheep with HIM in charge. Not only that, I also sold there and showed them the sale later, they were biting themselves on the y...a and swearing))))

Before that, I told them to sell above 1.14 and from 1.12, they also bought. When I told them to sell above 1.14 and 1.12 they also bought.

As for Spirit on red, he is a dumb-head, Romain, his friend, had been buying euro for 3 weeks with his online levels in ToC.

And that 0.9 will be so no way.

I wish I knew when))).
 
And that dumb-headed Mmmmoguchy is pissed because he didn't get it, all in private, thought I'd hand him a silver platter))))))
 
new-rena:

It happens to everyone, I can tell you that. There's an error in the calculation by hand. If you drill the calculator, it won't calculate the same way. You need a program.

You need to analyse the archive of reports on history, check the method of calculation and so on.

But no one wants to use our hands to overlay all available reports on the history to find the error - well, where and what was the error - why did I give a forecast downwards, but the price went up?

There should be no errors by default! After all, as he said - "the price after the forecast goes where it needs to go..." "no slippage"!!! But it's not listening, damn it))))

But the funny thing is that after all this, he dumped the others - and he had done some good. Just someone on a longer interval. And they are naturally less errors by definition!!!
 
sxww:
And that dumb-ass Mmmm-mighty is freaking out because he didn't get it, he was poking around in private, thinking I'd hand him a silver platter))))))
No, you don't need it on a silver platter. You have to use your brain, understand the physics of numbers - what they mean and what they affect, and then count. I think it is better to try to get the hang of it and then share your insights. The dialogue needs to be short and to the point.
 
sxww:

And that 0.9 will be there, that's not an option.

When Lesorubych says that, you're mocking him...