I have been charged, where do I find out what for? - page 19
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Yes, I think so too, whatever the truth, whatever the justice, as long as they get their silver coins.
I originally had a higher opinion of the resource, now it has fallen.
What's wrong with that attitude? The service is commercial. I do everything for money at work too.
We don't touch morality or justice. Nothing personal, just business.
Why are you ignoring my request to publish
because you're publishing the clippings yourself.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/15909/page9#comment_684867
I have written to the developer in a private message asking him to visit the topic.
so far no word
Until the administration shows the full story, this statement is a lie.
let the customer show it.
he didn't show his lines for nothing.
So that's the way it should be.
he agrees by default
kylinar2012- make a copypaste of ALL.
Not just the rabo's answers, but the whole thing.
Make it five sheets - whatever.
Because you post the clippings yourself
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/15909/page9#comment_684867
Publish NOT the clippings.
Tired of saying that.
Publish NOT the Slices.
Tired of saying that.
Why can't you publish the whole thing yourself?
Make a copy and paste of the whole story?
Why? Because customers who are not sure that they will get their money back in case of a conflict will be excluded.
Because the practice of governance.
Public systems without direct control are not viable without coercion. For the system to work efficiently and develop, it is imperative to have counterbalances to destructive forces.
Let the customer show it.
he didn't show his lines for nothing.
Then that's the way it should be.
he agrees by default
The tribunal has to dot the I's and cross the T's.
And maybe punish someone again.
In all neutrality to the parties.
I originally had a higher opinion of the resource, now it has fallen.
If the admin had posted the correspondence, which has the status of "confidential", to the public, then I would have thought about trusting the resource. As it is, you're stirring the waters, so what's stopping you from posting the full version?
I support the proposal to block the commission amount in the executor's account, the initiator of the termination should pay (or the perpetrator by Arbitration decision).