Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 2887
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Each bar has an internal structure. If the structures coincide, it may be some condition.
A bar can be considered as a complex structure.
The example shows 5 minute bars in 1 hour. The hours are sliced not at the beginning of the hour, but I think the point is clear, that there is a difference between looking at a bare hour bar or a structural bar.
there are no working patterns with a fixed number of bars on the market, as I wrote above (at least I have not found any).
And using patterns with a dynamic size is a challenge (I mean within the framework of MO), there are methods for these purposes, at least the same wave analysis, but then MO is not needed at all.
I can't understand what is the difference between increments and absolute price difference in the window. Besides, you can train not only on increments, you can train on relative changes from absolute price, or on logarithmic changes from absolute price)))))
returns are the difference x[i] - x[i-1]
and sometimes you need x[ i] - x[i-1044 ]
1) in order to trade something, it must first be properly analysed, increments are not suitable for analysis, because knowledge of past prices is lost.
1) Almost always the target variable is either an increment or something related to it. Incorporating increments into features is another matter. But very often simple transformations allow us to see the relationship of traits to increments. For example, the difference of averages can be written as a linear combination of increments, etc.
2) Personally, apophenia gets in my way. It's hard not to see something you really want to see. I'd rather have some way of measuring the significance of levels - the return to them, for example.
3) SB is quite good at drawing double tops. It is important to check if there is any difference from the SB associated with this particular pattern.
4) Well, we have singled out the state from the list of participants. One list of possibilities of its influence on the market is several pages, but how can you find out when and what it applies from this list? Well, yes, there is fundamental analysis, but it is also not a panacea and it is difficult to do.
Ideally, according to tsos, you should take ticks, filter them and downsample them, otherwise aliasing will appear
But forex is not Tsos, it's a different physics, right?
I want to run some strategies on historical data. Please recommend ready-made solutions for modelling!
If you want to do everything yourself, there is a CodeBase section with many ready examples of Expert Advisors and indicators. You can use them as a basis for your research. In this case you can test strategies using MT4/MT5 tools. MT5 also has integration with the python programming language. You can quite easily upload the required historical data and work with it. Here is an example of the upload function
To test your strategies you need a tester written in python. I have posted mine in this thread (you can search under All Posts in my profile).
If you don't want to bother, there is a Freelance section where you can make a trading robot/indicator for your strategy for your money.
there are no working patterns with a fixed number of bars on the market, as I wrote above (at least I have not found any).
And using patterns with a dynamic size is a challenge (I mean within the framework of MO), there are methods for these purposes, at least the same wave analysis, but then MO is not necessary at all.
MO should be supported and applied, but at other levels of understanding of conditions for application.
No standard MO model can give a ready result head-on. But there are workarounds to apply MO.
Pattern recognition, who's up for that kind of hassle?
Or through wavelets with downsampling.
Pattern recognition, who's up for that kind of hemmorhage?
Or through wavelets with downsampling.
Pattern recognition or market model recognition is the first brick.
It can be done with MQL tools, but with MO this method will be more advanced and progressive.
P.s.
We can look into the future more boldly.
Pattern recognition, who's up for that kind of hemmorhage?
Or through wavelets with downsampling.
This may have worked when most of the money was handled by visualisers. Now it's mostly matstat and MO. The fact that we have a predominance of retired visualisers here on the forum should not be confusing.