You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
...
What does that tell you? - That someone has found ashortcut to imitating "intelligence"....
...It's the same with me in programming. I found ashortcut to UI.
... Humans have found a way around Nature's complexity in the matter of simulating intelligence ...
... "Unpacking"Superdecision has always provided progress....
To add to the above:
When I first watched an interview ofOpenAI chief engineer Ilya Sutzkever to some YouTube journalist (about a year ago), I was struck by a phrase.
Speaking about AI development he said something like this:"All we need is to predict the next word" .
Frankly, I was "bummed."
I thought he was a serious intelligence researcher... I thought he was trying to explain the nature of consciousness, thinking, the psyche... And suddenly I find out that the chief AI developer just wants to predict the next word in a sentence based on statistical probability! And that's what he's building a conversational AI on!
How can you not be blown away?))))))) It's like realising for the first time that Father Christmas isn't real.))))))
And you know what the most frustrating thing is? He succeeded. It was Ilya who created the first GPT-3 level conversational AI. It was only then that I realised how smart he really is.
In other words, he's smart enough not to take on research that his company will never do. Like studying the psyche and the human mind.He took ashortcut and came up with the ultimate goal .
And yet, his sober and cynical attitude to the issue of AI creation suddenly made me deeply respect Ilya's mind. Not everyone can adequately weigh knowledge and possibilities to survive the maximum result. He could.
And now he continues to try to "unpack" Superdecision with next-word prediction and scale the technology. He talked about it in the same interview. Whether it will succeed, I don't know.
Superresolution always has a limit. I know it well from my work with Kernel Drive. ...Ilya must have already reached the limit.
What's the nextshortcut? ))
Continued tomorrow...
P.S. This and previous questions will be discussed tomorrow. I will also post examples of working with markup language.
To everyone. To everyone who has tested GUIs published by several authors. And even the authors.
Yes, I'll help you. Motivation's back. I need some time to recover my memory. Keep an eye on that thread I linked to. I'll post there when I'm ready.
Thank you. I'll look forward to it. I guess I'm not the only one.
In general, I wonder why MQ hasn't implemented something like this. There is only a set of small "build it yourself" elements. At a very low level. Someone will say - MQL5 has everything to programme anything you want. But you have to spend too much effort on something that is not an end in itself, but only a tool.
Many people need a GUI for more convenient management and analysis.
I have been following it since MQL3. The language and performance have developed tremendously. The developers of the language are amazing. But the MT interface has remained at a primitive level, minor flaws are still there for an hour of work. As I joked once, they should hire a second programmer.
Thank you. I'll look forward to it. I guess I'm not the only one.
In fact, I wonder why MQ hasn't implemented something like this. There is only a set of small "build it yourself" elements. At a very low level. Someone will say - MQL5 has everything to programme anything you want. But you have to spend too much effort on something that is not an end in itself, but only a tool.
Many people need a GUI for more convenient management and analysis.
I have been following it since MQL3. The language and performance have developed tremendously. The developers of the language are amazing. But the MT interface has remained at a primitive level, minor flaws are still there for an hour of work. As I joked once, they should hire a second programmer.
a long time ago, in the days of "core-engine", everyone told Peter - to make things go, get yourself a resource...with his graphomania, it is not difficult to fill and promote the matter
a website/repo/blog, etc..
And now it's too late to drink borjomi, now the epitaph is published here.
example to all: in order not to repeat this sad experience - keep projects as a separate entity.
Even if no one uses my labour, I will quietly finish and move on. That's the plan.
I have no regrets. Don't get your hopes up.))
In a few days I'll post three open .mqh files.
Quite generous. Much will depend not on functionality, but on explanations inside the code (preferably in Russian), as well as examples of different panels are required - it makes understanding the code much easier.