![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's amazing how easily the market turns on a self-destruct cycle. After all, it was easy to do without these neural networks. All these neural networks that draw and play are useless, because they can't even be monetised by developers because there are too many competitors, but they do a fantastic amount of harm to the market. And nobody manages this process...
that's exactly what monetisation smells like.
for example
machine learning: they write through libraries, without knowing what's inside and without turning on their brains.
// neural networks - it's easy, download, switch on and upload.
ii: it writes itself, you don't have to use your head.
it's all a path to degradation, which will lead to the development of consumers, and as a consequence, monetisation of a small group.
Exactly, it's not the art that's dying, it's the craft. Now it will be more and more difficult to sell genital smears and painted geometric figures.
Art is crystallising, people are beginning to create for the sake of emotions, sensations and knowledge of their inner world, not for profit and "monetisation". World-famous canvases become the property of the majority, people begin to distinguish canvases stained in drug delirium from beautiful creations of Artists.
And the ways of monetisation will also be ennobled, quality scripts, scene designers will be valued, and artists will not go anywhere from motion pictures.
It's amazing how easily the market turns on a self-destruct cycle. After all, it was easy to do without these neural networks. All these neural networks that draw and play are useless, because they can't even be monetised by developers because there are too many competitors, but they do a fantastic amount of harm to the market. And nobody controls this process....
The crisis of painting and music was visible years ago, when they were still alive. Today, endless generations are turning the once high art into mockery, with all the traits of meaningless consumption. A kind of "gluttony" ... But I won't go into metaphors.
The market lives as long as there is demand. Demand gives birth to supply. Everyone knows the rule - no demand - no supply. There will be no more mass demand for painting, and there will be no more demand for music.... It's enough to say "AI, make me a song with this motive and meaning" or "draw me a picture like this". Free of charge. No labour.
The market is over as soon as it becomes a dumping ground for cheap products. That's what's happening.
I'm not in favour of pessimistic scenarios, but it's not clear how to avoid it.
Will not avoid it.
The "economy" will move one level up .
Like programming languages . Natural language will be a programming language now.
Movies will become interactive and you'll get a "share" of the revenue for "forking" the movie toward a direction most people liked (watched).
Etc . Why ? Because
a. people have evolved to find meaning
b. there is an incentive to "de-throne" giant corporations for those who do it as well (unless its all done by microsoft...like Deus Ex (the game) predicted)
Some additional thoughts :
We are moving to a future where :
I believe we'll see weird professions emerge :
And also , unfortunately , there will be incentives (at first optional) that will "distribute" rewards if :
On the side of law , there will be amendments to the tune of "right to experience".
Meaning a human is born , can contribute nothing to society but has the right to experience this world.
Then this law will extend to machines.
To simplify , there will be "points" that humans can use to "experience" things , but, those who have a lesser impact (according to the leaders) to resource reserves they will receive more points. Or the opposite , the "bad behavior" (according to leaders) compounds on the price of goods for a human . For example , if you eat one stake per month it costs 10$ . If you had 3 stakes already it costs 25$ (just for you) etc.
Something similar to the movie "In Time" , sort of . (without the bad acting)
Chapter Four.
Invasion of the AI.
To summarise some interesting thoughts that happened to be between chapters of the narrative:
Continued tomorrow and new material....