You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You could add comparing LLM to some depersonalised liberalist politician.
He speaks very well and beautifully, and at first we think that he is highly intelligent. But when we start to dive into the details, we are surprised to learn that the guy is a cuckoo. No intelligence.
And this is a very dangerous thing, when beautifully spoken or written words are perceived by the untrained masses as the presence of artificial intelligence.I felt point 1 on myself, well, in terms of becoming interested in all these semantic connections and how we ourselves think with words (actually, we don't think with words). In general, LLM is a paradise for linguists, in terms of studying languages and meanings.
As for purely language(s) - it's a solid A. Well, that's how they were originally conceived.
Imagine, you have learnt to express your thoughts better than others (at least better than Andrei), and you are already rated by others as having a higher intelligence! Although you just learnt to use the structure of the language well.LLMs can be used for many things, but you can easily do without them. They are cool, but not much needed. Useful, but books and even Wikipedia are more useful (in my opinion).
In practical application - highly overrated by bloggers and adverts.
I've read people who have a really cool speech and I'm far from them. And so - thanks, of course).
And also, we in the thread agreed not to get personal, otherwise we erase posts. No one is an exception.
I'll be posting the first part of chapter four today.
However, I decided to make some changes to the previously approved plan. Serious consideration of the psychological effect of conversational AI on the individual's subconsciousness has been postponed to the end of the story, as the topic is complex and requires deep analysis. An obvious indication of "deification" or"grail-mania" syndrome is obviously not enough. Let's try to make something in the spirit of Jung or Blavatsky (archetypes, etc.), but in the context of the market exploitation of the weaknesses of the human subconscious)). Let's add disclosure of the reason why OpenAI so zealously undertook for conversational AI, and not for some other (it's not for nothing). And let's finally solve the mystery of who Musk really is.
But I will add all this in a dosed manner, gradually building a complete picture.
However, first I will focus on the issue of cheaper robotics and factory automation. Using simple examples of emergencies, accidents and breakdowns, we will trace the limits of automation capabilities. After all, the weak link here is not a robot, but a factory with all its nuances. Let's look at them closely and in great detail. Literally at the level of extracting a screw stuck in the machine, which requires the work of a whole team of specialists.
It will be interesting.
Main theses of the third chapter:
Incomplete list of production processes and process steps:
The list gives a general idea of the logical sequence of actions leading to the emergence and operation of a technical product.
Further...
Technical infrastructure:
Continued tomorrow...
For some reason, the possibility of disproportionate development of different areas is assumed - AI develops very much, but production technologies remain at the current level.
For example, the current approach to working with metal is extremely inefficient. We can assume that instead of it there will be powder metallurgy, combined with 3D printing and supplemented with the technology of collecting and processing everything broken back into powder.
Somehow, the possibility of disproportionate development of different areas is assumed - AI develops a lot, while production technologies remain at the current level.
For example, the current approach to working with metal is extremely inefficient. We can assume that instead of it there will be powder metallurgy, combined with 3D printing and supplemented with the technology of collecting and processing everything broken back into powder.
In my time, I often passed by one of the city bookstores where old Soviet technical literature was sold for pennies - shabby volumes in unsightly covers, with wrinkled corners and yellowed pages. I remember curiously picking them up and leafing through them. I was very interested in technology back then. The books were about microelectronics, reinforced concrete structures, automation, industrial chemistry, the general structure of technical systems, mechanics, machine tools, logistics. There was a sea of books and each one contained incredibly complex material. Formulas and diagrams on every sheet. Each book had several authors - engineers, scientists.
There was always a time gap in Soviet books. The technical specialists described the current state of affairs well, while the writers described the distant bright future. The not-so-distant future was always left out of consideration or the representation of it was inadequate. A typical example is the famous passage about the unnecessity of the Windows OS by Soviet engineers in one book.
Powder metallurgy has been developing quite a bit recently - for example, last year the states conducted the first test launch of a rocket, most of which (over 80%) was printed on a 3D printer. With the right level of development, this technology will change everything much more than even the introduction of the electric motor (the second industrial revolution).
There was always a time gap in Soviet books. Technical experts were good at describing the current state of affairs, while writers were good at describing the distant bright future. The not so distant future was always left out of consideration or the idea of it was inadequate. A typical example is the famous passage about the unnecessity of the Windows OS by Soviet engineers in one book.
Powder metallurgy has been developing quite a bit recently - for example, last year the states conducted the first test launch of a rocket, most of which (over 80%) was printed on a 3D printer. With the right level of development, this technology will change everything much more than even the introduction of the electric motor (the second industrial revolution).
Well we're talking about metal 3D printing on printers, which has only recently emerged. This is a very obvious opportunity to combine AI with technology. If this is complemented by nanotechnology, the potential opportunities will increase many times over.
I am not saying that this is a matter of the immediate future, but the speed of change since the 19th century is quite impressive, especially compared to the speed of biological evolution.